Texas Holdem Poker Forum : JOIN US!
|
- Texas Holdem Tips
Get our latest Texas Holdem Articles hot off the press! - Internet Poker Forum Feed
A must have - All the latest poker forum posts, 24/7 - Close this
TEXAS HOLDEM CASH GAMES FREE : 'Harrington on Cash Games: I & II' NEW! |
Texas Holdem / Poker Strategy Author
Co-Author of the recently published, 'Poker Mindset' poker Psychology book,, Ian 'Piemaster' Taylor is from London UK and has been playing poker seriously for two years and socially for a number of years before that. Mainly a limit specialist who has enjoyed success at levels up to and including 5/10 and has also dabbled in No-Limit and tournament hold'em as well as Omaha. He is especially well versed in the psychological aspects of the game, and so will often write about the more human elements of the game rather than middle-of-the-road strategy. |
| The Danger of Optimism |
In most things in life, there is little danger in being optimistic. In fact studies have shown that optimists tend to be happier and more successful than pessimists. Approaching most things in life thinking you will be successful leads to a greater chance you will be successful for psychological reasons beyond the scope of this article. In poker too being an optimist can sometimes be a good thing. Certainly it is a bad idea sitting down to play poker thinking you are going to lose.
However, it is important to differentiate the things that it doesn’t pay to be optimistic about. Cards don’t give a damn about your frame of mind. Probabilities don’t change because you are in a good mood. If you are optimistic about events that have a fixed probability and change your actions accordingly then you are playing sub-optimally. This article will explore the areas in poker in which optimism can hurt you, and maybe a good old-fashioned dose of pessimism would be better. Your Opponent's Hand In Hold’em, the great unknown is the cards your opponents hold. Through their betting patterns you try to determine their most likely holdings, which along with your own cards allows you to determine your best course of action. If you allow your calculations to be influenced by optimism, then your read and your resulting decisions will also be bad. The most common manifestation of this is the calling station syndrome, where despite increasingly mounting evidence to the contrary, you are clinging onto the hope that your hand might be good. Consider the following hand: You are in the big blind. A middle position player raises, the button calls, and you make a slightly loose call with Tc8c. The button you know is a loose player, and MP is new to the table and you have no read on him. The flop comes Td 9s 3d You check and MP bets, the button calls, you check-raise, MP 3-bets. You decide that there is a good chance he has AK and he is trying to bully you off your hand. Or he may just be a maniac, you don’t have any hands on him to tell. The button then calls two cold, and you figure he may well be on a flush draw. You call. Turn (Td 9s 3d) Kh You check and MP bets out. While you put him on AK, you figure he could just as easily have AQ or even AJ and is trying to buy the pot. The button calls and you still put him on a flush draw. You call. River (Td 9s 3d Kh) 7d MP bets out again and the button now raises. You figure there is a small chance you have the best hand, because your opponents may have…. what exactly? MP has shown strength all through the hand and there is every indication that the button has hit his draw. You somehow manufacture a call on the basis that MP may be overplaying something like A9, the button might be making a crazy raise on a busted hand, and you are getting decent pot odds. MP calls and turns over AT, the button turns over Jh8h. Optimism got you into trouble in this hand from the start. When the flop came you automatically put the aggressor on one of the hands you could beat instead of one of the many you couldn’t. Then you changed your read when the hand you put him on now beat you. Then you changed your read on the other player when it is obvious he had hit a hand. You subconsciously allowed what you hoped your opponents held to proxy for what logic should indicate they might hold. A similar but opposite example of misplaced optimism can be seen when the player in question is the aggressor. For example, a player with top pair will keep betting into an opponent who they figure must have middle pair and yet when the middle card pairs, they carry on betting, presumably changing their read because it was easier than accepting they had probably been outdrawn. The consistent trait of the optimist is that they will always put an opponent on a worse hand than is statistically likely, even if that means changing their read. Number of Outs Counting outs is another area where players are often overly optimistic. On the flop, it is often tempting to consider every hand that gives you top pair or better an out, and sometimes even more than that if the board is non-threatening. Take the following example. You are UTG+2 and you have Kd Qd. UTG calls, you raise, the cutoff re-raises, the BB, UTG and you all call. Flop comes Js 9d 5s How many out do you give yourself here? An optimist might say they have four outs to the straight, six to top pair and a backdoor flush draw so that’s about 12. However, optimism is not good when looking at outs. How should you really count them? Well you have 3 outs to the nuts (Td, Th, Tc). The Ts is tainted as it could give someone a flush. Even if it doesn’t, it could be dangerous as it leaves you with the possibility of a fourth spade on the river killing you. You also have 6 outs to top pair, but how good are these exactly? These outs could give someone else an even better hand if any of your opponents hold AK, AQ, KJ, K9, K5, QJ, Q9, Q5, QT or KT. Plus there is always the possibility that the cutoff (who re-raised pre-flop remember) may hold AA, KK or QQ or that someone has already made a set. Even if you make top pair and it is good, you will be dodging a huge amount of bullets on the river. All in all, your two over-cards are almost worthless. You also have a backdoor flush draw. This is probably worth about 1.5 outs max. So overall I would say you have: 3 outs to the straight after discounts for redraws, the tainted Ts and possibility of a split pot. 1.5 outs to overcards and this is being generous and including oddities like runner-runner Q’s 1.5 outs to backdoor flush.
Basically any situation where an optimist will choose a suboptimal strategy based on an assumption of a higher than average outcome will cause them to lose money in the long run.
If you are one of nature optimists, make sure you don’t bring this attitude to the table with you. When you are playing, make sure you are playing not with hope but with reason. Think ‘what is likely’ rather than ‘what is possible in a best case scenario’. |










