Internet Poker Forum
The Best Poker Books, Poker Forum, & PokerStars Marketing Code & Bonus

Dimat Poker Books
Welcome to Internet Texas Holdem, home of Dimat poker books
“Publishing Today’s Best Poker Books”

To purchase our print books or poker ebooks, visit our store.


Ammon Brown aka ammbo


A few months later (In October 2003, I believe) I began playing limit SnGs on PokerRoom for play money. I ran my $1K in play money up to 42K and made my first deposit in January 2004. I played a lot of $50 limit SnGs on PokerRoom. I learned my starting hands by referring constantly to their

I have not had a down month yet and I hope it continues.  My pro career is young and I am not yet losing interest in the game. I feel that is of the utmost importance if one is to be successful as a pro. 

In short, I credit a passion for poker and a thirst to become better with getting me where I am now, wherever that is. ITH fueled this immensely as did some friends I had. I still do not know how good I am, but I know I can always improve, and I will continue to seek to do so.

Expected Value Sets. I only played hands with +EV of at least .01 and at least .1 to a raise. This actually worked well preflop but my postflop play was bad. My bankroll was fluctuating a fair bit but I won about $600 in the first two months. I moved to NL SnGs because they filled up faster and my variance went way up. In total I deposited almost $2000 (I was making VERY good money at the time).

I met an ITHer (legaleagle97 in the
forum) at Foxwoods and the two of us hit it off talking poker. He pointed me to this website on December 22, 2003. You can see my first post here. I bought Matthew's book through the site and read it thoroughly. It may have been my first poker book, if not it was my second.  The chronology escapes me.  I started reading everything I could and I now own about 25 poker books, all of which I have read at least once.

I am not sure at what point I moved from break even to above average where I consider myself now. Perhaps the turning point was winning into the
Party Poker Million Cruise in March 2004. I won my way on with a great deal of luck and a few tricks I picked up in limit SnGs. I was scared dumb to play pros on the cruise , though, so I began reading in earnest. I was reading and rereading Sklansky's TPFAP and other books prior to the tournament and took about 8 books on the cruise with me. In the weeks leading up to that tournament I think I learned more about poker than any one month period before or since.

After the cruise I continued studying and reading my book and posting on ITH. Books are not a substitute for interactive advice and discussion so the ITH forum was a boon for me. Seadood and Scapegote helped me immensely along the way as did BernardDogs.

At this point I was hooked. I had my friend in New York taking me to poker clubs in the city and he was a great friend to talk poker with (we 'worked' together). I was hooked to the point that I was making almost as much money at poker as I was at my job. My situation changed substantially when my wife was accepted to law school 5 hours away from the city. This was tipping point for my decision to go pro. Being 5 hours away from her, making plenty of money at poker, and hating my new job all led to the decision. Six months after she went to school I left my job at a pre-IPO Google and entered the "pro poker draft." 

 

Everyone knows that in poker, weak means strong and strong means weak.It is one of the central axioms of Mike Caro’s classic book, Caro’s Book of Poker Tells.However, if everyone at your table knows this then you will need to change your strategy to stay a step ahead of thoughtful opponents. One way of doing this is using aggression to trap your opponents. If your opponents are expecting a weak bet from a strong hand, trap them with a strong bet from a strong hand. Make strong mean strong!

An excellent example of this concept came up in a recent WPT episode. Thang “Kido” Pham raised the minimum with 3 3 and Carlos Mortensen reraised him the minimum with 8 5. The flop came K 8 3. Mortensen made a small bet and Pham raised an amount double the pot, to 600,000! Mortensen did not know what to make of this and ended up using the entire clock and having his hand declared dead. Because Carlos Mortensen is a savvy player, he read Pham’s bet as very weak when Pham’s hand was very strong. Pham’s gambit nearly elicited a call from Mortensen who read the bet as very weak.

Another example is a hand from the 2004 WSOP, one many of you remember well. Our own Matthew Hilger raised under the gun with AA. He made a raise that was much larger than the standard raise, so much that it elicited comments from other players. Al Krux, a good player himself, read this bet as weak and moved all in with two tens. The play worked flawlessly. Matthew explained the play by saying, “These are good players. If I limp in under the gun they will suspect a trap. If I make a small or standard raise they will be inclined to respect the raise since it is under the gun. However, if I make a larger bet they will think I am trying to make a move and steal a pot and may read me as weak.”

A final example is from a $25/$50 limit cash game I played online. Many of my opponents were loose but good players. I raised from the button with 3 3 hoping to steal the pot. Both blinds called. The flop cam 6 6 3! The small blind bet and the big blind called. Now, the only thing the big blind should call with here is a 6. I raised. The small blind called and the big blind called. The turn was an 8. Both blinds checked and I bet. The small blind folded and the big blind checkraised, as I had hoped. I three bet him here and he capped. On the river, my opponent asked me in the chat, “AA or KK?” and then bet the river. I raised him again and he called, winning me a big pot. In this hand, by raising the flop I led my opponent to believe that he had me trapped and was beating my big pair. Also, my raise on the flop made him believe I would bet the turn so he could checkraise me there. By playing aggressively I made extra bets that I would not have otherwise collected.

So when should you use aggression to trap your opponents? Surely not all opponents will read strong betting as weakness and vise versa. A few conditions must be met in order to effectively trap with aggression.

First, you have to know your opponents. Knowledgeable, aggressive players are your targets for this move. You want to try this play against opponents who can read bets correctly and will act on those reads by trying to bluff you or calling with marginal hands. Big bets might get a call from an astute player’s middle pair if he smells a rat whereas a small or medium bet will seem to him that you are trying to get called. Weak opponents will see a big bet as strength and fold immediately.

You also need to have the right table image. If you are viewed as a complete rock, all of your bets will be respected, big or small. Even aggressive players may not want to play pots with you. However, if you are viewed as a weak player this play will make you a lot of money. Your opponents will pounce on your ‘weak’ bets and trap themselves into calling or raising your bets. A weak player making a huge bet is a welcome sight to most great players.

Finally, you need the right hand to do this with. Making a huge bet with only one pair is dangerous, as you may be the one getting trapped. Normally a set, a straight, or at least two pair is ideal for this play to work. If you are trapping with aggression preflop, you will want to have AA or KK.

Trapping with aggression is a fairly advanced play that will only work correctly under the right circumstances. However, when it works it can be very rewarding. Just be sure that your opponents are good players and your hand is very strong. It also helps if you are seen as a weak player. After all, we all know that weak means strong