|
|
| Author |
Message |
jackblackwild
Joined: 08 Mar 2007 Posts: 3 Location: LA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: the psychology behind bluffing/reading faces |
|
|
I recently came across a really cool clip about an ex cia agent named Joe Navarro. He apparently has used all his training from spy hunting and applied it towards poker, which is really interesting to see done. Navarro goes into how you can read people beyond the obvious twitches and he also gets into how you can make it hard for others to read your game. The whole psychological aspect of poker is really displayed. I don't know really where you can find more about him, but I know he is on youtube.
-Cheers guys  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6918 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
He has recently written a book with Phil Hellmuth called Read 'Em and Reap.
No idea if it's any good or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bugsbunny Wascally
Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Posts: 7622 Location: Drinking Carrot juice
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | He has recently written a book with Phil Hellmuth called Read 'Em and Reap.
No idea if it's any good or not. |
It's good |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FindingNemo
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 211 Location: USA- MN
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bugsbunny wrote: | | Piemaster wrote: | He has recently written a book with Phil Hellmuth called Read 'Em and Reap.
No idea if it's any good or not. |
It's good |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nsidestrate Suited's Love Monkey
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 22399
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
As a minor quibble, he is an ex-FBI agent, not CIA. He also does a number of seminars in Vegas. Reviews are somewhat mixed.
I have been reading the books by Paul Ekman recently to great effect. He does some very dry scholarly material about how to read facial expressions and assess the emotional state of people based on those facial expressions. He believes that facial expressions associated with emotiion are universal and virtually impossible to suppress. Even when people try very hard to mask their emotions, they tend to appear very quickly in fleeting "micro-expressions" before the person composes their face back into the mask they hope to portray. I have found these books to be extremely helpful to me in poker situations (and in wife understanding situations). Although these books are not intended for poker players specifically, I found them much more useful for poker to me than the Navarro book, although I think the Navarro book has value too.
In poker, the micro-expressions of concern and happiness are often 100% certain tells for me. In wife-management the difference between real and faux anger has saved my skin a number of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poker_Elmo 2K Club
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 2724 Location: PA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nsidestrate wrote: |
I have been reading the books by Paul Ekman recently to great effect. He does some very dry scholarly material about how to read facial expressions and assess the emotional state of people based on those facial expressions. |
Is there one or two you recommend most? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nsidestrate Suited's Love Monkey
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 22399
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| poker_Elmo wrote: | | nsidestrate wrote: |
I have been reading the books by Paul Ekman recently to great effect. He does some very dry scholarly material about how to read facial expressions and assess the emotional state of people based on those facial expressions. |
Is there one or two you recommend most? |
I'd probably go with Emotions Revealed as my first choice. It is the most readable of his books. In ascending order of dry and academic, I'd go with Unmasking the Face and What the Face Reveals: Basic and Applied Studies of Spontaneous Expression Using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) as my next two choices. The last one is the most complex and technical and in some ways the most useful.
Basically, he identifies each muscle on the face and when it moves and then categorizes the thousands of combinations of facial expressions. The first two books describe the process and include examples. The last book is essentially a compilation of various journal articles and goes into microscopic detail.
I'm seriously considering ordering his CD based PC training course for $50. It has to be easier than the FACS, which is extremely dense. I suspect it would be more useful. I have also cheated and only bothered to learn those expression I thought could be helpful to me in poker. Assistance in wife-reading was an unintentional side effect.
If you are interested, here is a really cool interview with him. I especially love this passage, because he is so right:
| Quote: | | What is harder to spot is fabricated expressions. If I put on enjoyment, there is a telltale clue, but very subtle. Most people don't know what it is. I could tell you now, but it might ruin your life, because then you would know whether the people were really enjoying themselves. You should pause now -- it's like some of these Internet things -- "Do you really want to learn this?" Maybe your audience doesn't want to know this, because then you will know whether or not your spouse if really pleased. Is that worth knowing or worth not knowing? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7222 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I recently attended a seminar at our child's daycare, which talked about emotional development and the brain. They discussed some of the same stuff as Navarro's book. i.e. the connection between the limbic system and the thinking brain. Little children are great because there's very little filtering from the limbic system. It just comes out. As Navarro points out, the initial reaction is hardwired into us but as adults the filtering system becomes more sophisticated and the "don't reveal" pose Navarro recommends, along with sunglasses etc., can keep things from getting through.
I really liked Navarro's book, more than Caro's, but ultimately I see very few of these tells in real life. I don't think I'm unobservant, even though I still need to work on it. I just think most players with any experience don't show as many tells as some believe. I think it's probably because
a) some players have experience hiding tells
b) some players don't know that they're bluffing, etc because they're too inexperienced to know the relative strength of their hand or draw
c) some players are simply not that excited by the stakes they're playing so they don't exhibit emotional highs or lows
Just ordered Emotions Revealed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nsidestrate Suited's Love Monkey
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 22399
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jeffnc wrote: | | I really liked Navarro's book, more than Caro's, but ultimately I see very few of these tells in real life. I don't think I'm unobservant, even though I still need to work on it. I just think most players with any experience don't show as many tells as some believe. |
I think I see a lot of tells in live play. It may be because I think I'm generally pretty good at picking up on emotional cues in a non-poker context, but I frequently believe that I've picked up additional information during a hand. Interestingly, it rarely seems to be of the "he just placed his bet down hard" variety and more a kind of sub-conscious instinct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7222 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't get me wrong, I see tells, it's just that they're not as reliable as the impression you sometimes get.
You see "happy feet". Sometimes it's because they see the cocktail waitress coming up behind me. Or their favorite team just scored on the TV. You see a confidence tell, but they did it on purpose to throw you off. You play with the same group of guys, and a tell that seemed to be valid last month now means something else. Sometimes there will be a reliable tell, but that tell means either very strong or very weak, not medicore, so it's hard to know what to do. (e.g. one player in our game will occasionally make a casual chip toss for a large bet, and he will do the exact same thing with a flopped set and a flush draw. If the flush draw comes (or doesn't), what to do?)
I pick up more from betting patterns. But I'm still assuming there's more to learn from tells.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taardvark 1K Club
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1060 Location: Fremont, CA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jeffnc wrote: | Don't get me wrong, I see tells, it's just that they're not as reliable as the impression you sometimes get.
I pick up more from betting patterns. But I'm still assuming there's more to learn from tells.... |
I'm with you here. Personally I think tells are best used to flip your decision when it is really border line or when you are thinking about putting in a bluff. Although very useful, I think they tend to be a bit overrated. The problem with any of these books on tells is they have to exaggerate the behavior to illuminate the concept, when in reality most tells are far more subtle than what they show. The one thing that I do find helpful more as an ancillairy benefit is that if you start looking for tells, you are ultimately paying more attention to the game and that is always a good thing.
I find the betting patterns more useful most of the time. Maybe it's because of the online play and that is one of the few tells out there for it and that muscle is the strongest, but I tend to pick up betting pattern tells more than the physical tells. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fast Eddy 1K Club
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 1052
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I find tells most useful in NL facing large bets and tournaments. Beginners and/or poor players are sometimes rife with them.
If you can get an opponent who's just pushed all-in talking, it can be very helpful. I think there's almost always a story to be told by the demeanor of someone who's just made a huge bluff and/or hit a monster hand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|