|
|
| How would you rate Super System 2? |
| 1 - Bad Beat |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| 2 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 3 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 4 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 5 - Split Pot |
|
24% |
[ 7 ] |
| 6 |
|
20% |
[ 6 ] |
| 7 |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| 8 |
|
17% |
[ 5 ] |
| 9 |
|
17% |
[ 5 ] |
| 10 - The Nuts |
|
6% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 29 |
|
| Author |
Message |
mchilger ITH Founder and Poker Author
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 Posts: 5832 Location: Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:44 pm Post subject: Super System II by Doyle Brunson |
|
|
I will post more reviews over the coming weeks.
You can purchase Super System 2 by Doyle Brunson in our store.
Matthew |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Suited_Jock ITH Heart Throb
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 3010
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
To be honest I was a bit disappointed with the book. Before I get hung drawn and quatered let me tell you why.
Im exclusively a No_limit Holdem player and as such took some great advice from the original SS. After reading the NL section in SS2 I have yet to spot any new information. To me it looks like they have just cut and pasted from the original.
I might be wrong as I havent gone back to look at the original yet but I feel I have a decent enough memory.
Secondly the Mike Caro section was quite informative however anything about tells and pyschology he mentions in SS2 are in his book Caros book of tells.
I feel a bit like Ive wasted my money on this one. Thats not to say all the other sections are great? I just havent read them. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
pwtjax
Joined: 28 Dec 2003 Posts: 290 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So far I have read the limit holdem and omaha 8 hi/low sections.
The limit section didn't do much for me. This was probably because I have already read several entire books devoted to just limit. My advice is don't buy it for the limit section if you've read ITH and SSHE.
The Omaha hi/low section is really good. It is better than the Ray Zee book, which is generally considered the best one out there. In my opinion the book is worth the price for this section alone.
I am reading the no limit section. It's all new to me-- I didn't read SS 1. I will update this post when I finish the section, but my initial impression is that it is ok, but not great. I could see someone who doesn't have a firm grasp of the game having real problems trying to use this section. You have to know how to read between the lines sometimes and be able to reconcile advice that could be considered inconsistent on the surface. A player who has studied the game for a while should be able to do it fine, but I wouldn't want this in the hands of a total novice.
I've now finished to no-limit section and I'll stand by my original take. It's a must read for no-limit players, but I can't call it great. One reason is that I don't like the writing style. It's too conversational, not eidted well and too long for the info. covered. It would also be better with hand examples.
Sklansky and Miller are supposed to come out with a no limit book this summer and I expect it to put a real dent in the usefullness of this section.
I skimmed Caro's section and it looks pretty decent. It's hard for me to focus on Caro because the tells deal with live play and I'm too lazy to leave the house to play.
Last edited by pwtjax on Wed Mar 09, 2005 9:26 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
chrisjp Mr. Lovable
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 5014 Location: Round Rock, TX and Las Vegas
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've only read Caro and the NL section, both tourneys and ring. And the online info.
I thought Caro was great. My guess is that most of Caro is on his website. The NL was almost exclusively a retread of SS1. I already have SS1. I do love Doyle, but it is not worth it exclusively for the NL.
There are other sections though. If the Omaha H/L is great, like pjwtax says, this would make it worthwhile in and of itself.
I'm happy I got it...but you might not be if you get it. I know. I need to take a journalism class.
Chris |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
ebo8b 1K Club
Joined: 19 Jun 2005 Posts: 1096 Location: Northern VA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Super/System II is a great book...but I definitely do not recommend it as your first book unless you have a good grasp of many poker concepts. But I have learned a lot from the book...how to play Triple Draw for one. But if you just want Hold'em advice, this book probably isn't the best way for you to go. This fact does not detract from the book...the book's just meant for more of a broad audience. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Ironfist
Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 287 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was disappointed in the HE Limit section in the book. Hardly any mention of shorthanded and Heads UP play.
I will be spending some time reading up on the other poker variations ove r the coming months but am not qualified to comment on the level of advice on those games. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Penguin
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 14 Location: Malta
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't read SS1 but my take:
Limit Holdem section - average, predictable, contradictory in places
O8 and PLO - Worth the price of admission (although for me that wassigning up for Royal Vegas through this site ) by themselves.
Triple Draw - Very solid intro to a game I knew nothing
Internet section, WPT, tournament section - a waste of paper.
NL section - meh, I picked up at least that much from forums and online articles and experience. Sorry Doyle, you're not the only NL expert these days.
Haven't really cracked the stud section(s) yet.
Caro's tells - people play poker in the real world? Is that like a LAN party where you all take your laptops to somebody's house? |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
sprstoner
Joined: 12 Aug 2005 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im half way throught the limit section now... i have to disagree with you guys.... i love the advice i love the way its written... great section. i cant wait to finish it and reread it... excellent.
i will post my opinion of other sections as i read them |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
gusofhippo
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 2 Location: Various, but mainly Poker Champs
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 10:47 pm Post subject: This Book is REALLY good |
|
|
Dear All,
I disagree mightily with some of the posts here rating this as marginal, but do agree with some of the criticism:
1) The Caro stuff IS all on his website and found in everyone of his books. However, if you haven't read any of his stuff, this is a good introduction.
2) The History part and Doyle's biography were fun. Not strategy, but gives one perspective.
3) The Limit HE section is SUPERIOR - Harmen gives a very good OVERVIEW of this subject. HFAP it isn't, because it is not designed to be a definitive work on HE. It is an overview. One should remember that when criticizing it.
4) The split pot sections by Todd Brunson (78B) and Gregorich/Baldwin are the BEST two sections in this book. Clearly, and I would include Ray Zee's book, this is the best information on these two games out there, IMHO.
5) Negraunu's section on Triple Draw is excellent, and probably the best information out there, but is that saying alot.
6) The PLO section for me was disappointing. I think Rolf Slotboom in his review of this book stated it best:
| Quote: | Pot-limit Omaha high - Lyle Berman, 6
One of the sections that I really looked forward to, but that I found rather disappointing. The author doesn't discern between big stack and small stack play, and never mentions one of the most important things in pot-limit: the size of the bet in relation to your stack. I know that for a large part this is because Mr. Berman talks about deep-money games, but I still don't like his analysis of how to play the aces, and his discussion of why you should never raise in early position. The same objection I have about Stewart Reuben's PLO books, I've got here as well: The authors thinks in either / or type of bets, like either calling or raising the max., while in my view it is often much better to make small bets and raises, both to confuse my opponents and to gain the maximum amount of information at relatively little cost. Also, those who play online very often will not find many things in this chapter that they will find useful, as they will be playing in games where the money is shallow, making Mr. Berman's discussion of how to play the aces, and how to play in early position totally irrelevant to them. Of course, the section is not bad at all, and it actually gives a nice insight into the biggest games, but despite all this I have found remarkably good tips or strategies that I have not seen in other PLO books or articles. |
Shameless plug for Rolf, but you can visit his website www.rolfslotboom.com and he has a number of excellent reviews.
Finally, I think the criticism of Doyle Brunson's NL HE section is silly. First of all, yes, it is to a point a total rehash of what was written the first time. So what? He states in the opening that he thought it still held true today, and plenty of people haven't read the original, so I see no reason why to change.
Secondly, yes, I agree, it is not a good section to start applying if you are playing in shallow money, fish games. So, what?!?! Even Brunson says that at least 8 times in the book. If you are playing weak players play solid not imaginative poker. If you misread Brunson, as I did at first, it is your fault for not paying close attention to the text.
I found this a very fine book. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
camfire
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 144
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Overall I found the book to be very informative. Doyle's history was quite interesting and I enjoyed Caro's section. Though I'm not sure how helpful the NL section will be for lower limit players. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Radford 2K Club
Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 2757 Location: Sheffield, England
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is this book any good? I hear it being the 'Bible of poker' and so on. I usually play NLH multi-table tournaments but i don't know if this book would actually help me.
I've been reading the thoeyr of poekr by Slanksy but i find it really boring and the wording is hard to udnerstand. Since i don't even know the rules to most poker game, only hold em i didn't really understand what he was talking about half of the time.
Will this be the same? What does this book actually have to offer?
Cheers, Chris. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
fep 53o
Joined: 14 Sep 2003 Posts: 3107
|
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6959 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2006 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't dislike the book, but it doesn't tell you anything new. The strategy is all very rudimentary comapred with what you get in a specialist book. I guess it is a useful reference book to have in case you ever feel like playing triple-draw lowball or something, but I can't help but feel that this book has had it's time. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Primitive Odin Incarnate
Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 1896 Location: Oslo
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It made my Poker Library 4.7 cm wider. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
badboywes Never Satisfied
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 2574 Location: Barstow Ca
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really like the book let me tell you why. I was able to get vol 1 and 2 in leather bound edition from the web site for my player points.
I have only read some of it but im sure in the future as I look to learn more games ill pick it back up.
Thats why I like it the most. I know someday when I look to expand my game it will be there waiting with alot of valuable information. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
|