Poker Forums : 500,000+ Poker Forum Posts
Texas Holdem Odds Calculator
Odds Chart & Calculators
Poker Rakeback
Rakeback Comparison
Support the Forum - Vulcan Poker Bonus
GET BONUS | VULCAN POKER REVIEW
FAQ  |   Search Forum  |  Watched Topics Memberlist  |  Usergroups  |  Register  |  Profile  |  Log in   |  Log in to check your private messages
100% / $50 + Free Gifts 100% / $500 100% / $500 + Free Gifts 100%/500 + Free Gifts 100% / $600 + Free Gifts
Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Internet Texas Hold'em Forum Index  -> Limit Hold'em  | Search
Author Message
Da_Big_Fish
1K Club


Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Posts: 1721
Location: West Virginia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:03 pm    Post subject: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why... Reply with quote

Sometimes I feel like I fall in to being passive. I checked this hand with the ITH pre flop chart and it recommends a call, but I figure with 4 years of playing behind me if the flop doesn't work out I'd have the sense to get away from it. Would it be correct to reraise the flop here? And if I do that, am I locked into a CB on the turn since I showed so much strength on the flop?

0.1/0.2 Limit Holdem
9 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Pre-flop: (1.5 SB, 9 players) Hero is BB Queen of Hearts King of Diamonds
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, 5 folds, SB calls, Hero checks

Flop: 10 of Spades King of Hearts 3 of Hearts (4.0 SB, 4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG raises, UTG+1 calls, SB folds, Hero calls

Turn: 9 of Clubs (5.0 BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls

River: 10 of Clubs (8.0 BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks
Back to top of Forum
Piemaster
Author of THE POKER MINDSET


Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 6959
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that in the absense of reads, your only possible mistake here was not raising preflop for value (which is marginal). Passive play is not 'bad' per se. In fact, it is often the best line, depending on the situation and your opponents.
Back to top of Forum
Cript
Cheesehead


Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 5113
Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Piemaster wrote:
I think that in the absense of reads, your only possible mistake here was not raising preflop for value (which is marginal). Passive play is not 'bad' per se. In fact, it is often the best line, depending on the situation and your opponents.


UTG smells more like KJ/AT than anything that has us beat...TT/AK seem very unlikely, 33 I guess is possible...I'd prefer to 3-bet that flop though.
Back to top of Forum
the_hawk
Chelsea FTW!


Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 4452

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Given everyone's relative positions I think 3-betting the flop might simply be bloating the pot where we're not quite sure where we stand (although I agree there's a good chance we're in good shape here).

If the positions were different and we had a chance to make the likely flush draw holder call two cold then things might be different - but they've already cold-called here and a 3-bet isn't going to drive them out.

It's certainly true that passive isn't automatically bad.
Back to top of Forum
Cript
Cheesehead


Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 5113
Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_hawk wrote:
Given everyone's relative positions I think 3-betting the flop might simply be bloating the pot where we're not quite sure where we stand (although I agree there's a good chance we're in good shape here).

If the positions were different and we had a chance to make the likely flush draw holder call two cold then things might be different - but they've already cold-called here and a 3-bet isn't going to drive them out.

It's certainly true that passive isn't automatically bad.


I agree with your last statement...The reason I don't like just calling UTG's flop raise is because it gives him a great chance to pull a free card on the turn. I hate giving up the lead in a pot like this when I'm OOP. The only way I think it's ok to call this flop raise is if we're going to donk a non-heart turn. Granted, the 9 hits QJ (a possible cold-calling hand on the turn, so we might rethink there.)
Back to top of Forum
Piemaster
Author of THE POKER MINDSET


Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 6959
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also quite like the plan of donking the two of stars on the turn.
Back to top of Forum
Schlepper333
1K Club


Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 1211
Location: Las Vegas

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pre-flop SSHE recommends a call here, too. But I think it is borderline and dependent on how many limpers/how table is playing. SSHE raises if it were suited, though.
Back to top of Forum
shallam



Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 250

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:35 am    Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. Reply with quote

While you have a strong hand, it is just a pair and when someone raises you have to at least consider the possibility that you are beat. You could be up against AA, KK, AK, KT, TT, 33 and at these limits even T3s. And while I think I would have 3 bet the flop, just calling here is a close second. If you three bet and your opp caps you'll be pretty unhappy.

I slightly lean toward raising due to the presence of the second opp, charging him an extra bet gives you extra reward for those times you win. At these stakes many players with call with almost any two cards which might include a gutshot or a pocket pair. If your opp caps or raises the turn, I'd then go into passive check-call mode.

You say you don't know why you went to passive mode. My guess is that you did it because you got raised. A concept worth keeping in mind when you are on a draw and could use a free turn card.

BTW, I don't think that going into passive mode is terrible. Entirely understandable IMHO.
Back to top of Forum
shallam



Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 250

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After reading the comments of others I aggree that a very strong alternative is calling the flop and betting the turn (although I'd be aware that the 9 card fills in an OES draw). The downside of the call flop/lead turn play that you charge the second opp less for his his draw (raising the flop charges him 3 or 4 calling only 2).
Back to top of Forum
anthonya530



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 368
Location: Chapin SC

PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. Reply with quote

shallam wrote:
BTW, I don't think that going into passive mode is terrible. Entirely understandable IMHO.


I think it's 100% terrible if you're playing 6 players or less and you passively lmp in. Sure, you can limp along if there's others limping at a passive preflop table. But first in ? Hell no. In fact, that's one of the things I'm looking for in trying to identify worthwhile opponents.

And post flop ? Not sure when that would be "understandable" either.
Back to top of Forum
shallam



Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 250

PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. Reply with quote

anthonya530 wrote:
shallam wrote:
BTW, I don't think that going into passive mode is terrible. Entirely understandable IMHO.


I think it's 100% terrible if you're playing 6 players or less and you passively lmp in. Sure, you can limp along if there's others limping at a passive preflop table. But first in ? Hell no. In fact, that's one of the things I'm looking for in trying to identify worthwhile opponents.

And post flop ? Not sure when that would be "understandable" either.



He's in the BB. So none of these comments are relevant in this case PF.

Postflop I was merely proving a explanation for why he might have gone into passive mode. If you read my entire post you'll see that I recommend 3 betting the flop.
Back to top of Forum
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 7267
Location: NC, USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Preflop I think the check is fine - in some games you are likely enough to have people dominated so raising would be better, but you are also putting more money in the pot with bad position. Probably doesn't matter a whole lot since you'll just be betting right out for value if you hit the flop.

I would reraise the flop. It's obviously unlikely he has AK, but may very well have KJ or K9. KT is very possible but most players who would limp under the gun with KT are the type of players who are more likely to slowplay that a little more. Of course it should not be slowplayed and I myself might limp with that hand in some games and then pound the heck out of on the flop too.

Exact same can be said for TT except that it's slightly more likely to be slowplayed (but still shouldn't be).

If the player were particularly aggressive I'd think there were a good chance he had a good draw here, or just had KJ, so don't mind leading the turn again. Of course you're never "committed" to doing anything because you showed aggression. I'd do it simply for value and/or not giving a free card.

As for getting tricky to avoid "bloating the pot" and giving correct odds to draw on the turn, I'm not sure about that. Even if you just call they are getting correct odds for flushes and open ended straights, so you might as well put in more money when you're ahead. Even if you raise you won't be giving correct odds for gutshots. That leaves hands that have made one pair to the T or 3, like AT, T9, A3 etc. You are just about giving them the right price to call on the turn by raising.

Personally, I'm a little more interested with getting more value when I'm ahead than trying to make someone else make a mistake.
Back to top of Forum
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 7267
Location: NC, USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. Reply with quote

shallam wrote:
While you have a strong hand, it is just a pair and when someone raises you have to at least consider the possibility that you are beat.


Flop raises are cheap and the first 2 things I consider are K with a weaker kicker, or getting aggressive with a draw.


shallam wrote:
If your opp caps or raises the turn, I'd then go into passive check-call mode.


My opponent is never getting an opportunity to cap the turn against me! But I agree with you that the turn is where it's appropriate to slow down and get more passive.
Back to top of Forum
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 7267
Location: NC, USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. Reply with quote

anthonya530 wrote:
I think it's 100% terrible if you're playing 6 players or less and you passively lmp in. Sure, you can limp along if there's others limping at a passive preflop table. But first in ? Hell no.


Since we are neither at a shorthanded table nor first in, I don't see how your comments are relevant.
Back to top of Forum
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Internet Texas Hold'em Forum Index -> Limit Hold'em All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 



Powered by php.B.B 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 php.B.B Group

Poker Forum Sitemap

"The information and opinions in this forum are for informational and entertainment purposes only and are provided solely as the forum post author's opinion. The forum is not intended for use in areas where this information and/or advertisements may be considered illegal. Check your federal, state, and local laws concerning the legality of gambling and online gambling in your area."

Copyright 2009 © Dimat Online :: Poker Forum