|
|
| Author |
Message |
Da_Big_Fish 1K Club
Joined: 09 Feb 2005 Posts: 1721 Location: West Virginia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:03 pm Post subject: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why... |
|
|
Sometimes I feel like I fall in to being passive. I checked this hand with the ITH pre flop chart and it recommends a call, but I figure with 4 years of playing behind me if the flop doesn't work out I'd have the sense to get away from it. Would it be correct to reraise the flop here? And if I do that, am I locked into a CB on the turn since I showed so much strength on the flop?
0.1/0.2 Limit Holdem
9 players
Converted at weaktight.com
Pre-flop: (1.5 SB, 9 players) Hero is BB
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, 5 folds, SB calls, Hero checks
Flop: (4.0 SB, 4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets, UTG raises, UTG+1 calls, SB folds, Hero calls
Turn: (5.0 BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls
River: (8.0 BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6959 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think that in the absense of reads, your only possible mistake here was not raising preflop for value (which is marginal). Passive play is not 'bad' per se. In fact, it is often the best line, depending on the situation and your opponents. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Cript Cheesehead
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 5113 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | | I think that in the absense of reads, your only possible mistake here was not raising preflop for value (which is marginal). Passive play is not 'bad' per se. In fact, it is often the best line, depending on the situation and your opponents. |
UTG smells more like KJ/AT than anything that has us beat...TT/AK seem very unlikely, 33 I guess is possible...I'd prefer to 3-bet that flop though. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
the_hawk Chelsea FTW!
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 4452
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Given everyone's relative positions I think 3-betting the flop might simply be bloating the pot where we're not quite sure where we stand (although I agree there's a good chance we're in good shape here).
If the positions were different and we had a chance to make the likely flush draw holder call two cold then things might be different - but they've already cold-called here and a 3-bet isn't going to drive them out.
It's certainly true that passive isn't automatically bad. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Cript Cheesehead
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 5113 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the_hawk wrote: | Given everyone's relative positions I think 3-betting the flop might simply be bloating the pot where we're not quite sure where we stand (although I agree there's a good chance we're in good shape here).
If the positions were different and we had a chance to make the likely flush draw holder call two cold then things might be different - but they've already cold-called here and a 3-bet isn't going to drive them out.
It's certainly true that passive isn't automatically bad. |
I agree with your last statement...The reason I don't like just calling UTG's flop raise is because it gives him a great chance to pull a free card on the turn. I hate giving up the lead in a pot like this when I'm OOP. The only way I think it's ok to call this flop raise is if we're going to donk a non-heart turn. Granted, the 9 hits QJ (a possible cold-calling hand on the turn, so we might rethink there.) |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6959 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I also quite like the plan of donking the two of stars on the turn. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Schlepper333 1K Club
Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 1211 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pre-flop SSHE recommends a call here, too. But I think it is borderline and dependent on how many limpers/how table is playing. SSHE raises if it were suited, though. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
shallam
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 250
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. |
|
|
While you have a strong hand, it is just a pair and when someone raises you have to at least consider the possibility that you are beat. You could be up against AA, KK, AK, KT, TT, 33 and at these limits even T3s. And while I think I would have 3 bet the flop, just calling here is a close second. If you three bet and your opp caps you'll be pretty unhappy.
I slightly lean toward raising due to the presence of the second opp, charging him an extra bet gives you extra reward for those times you win. At these stakes many players with call with almost any two cards which might include a gutshot or a pocket pair. If your opp caps or raises the turn, I'd then go into passive check-call mode.
You say you don't know why you went to passive mode. My guess is that you did it because you got raised. A concept worth keeping in mind when you are on a draw and could use a free turn card.
BTW, I don't think that going into passive mode is terrible. Entirely understandable IMHO. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
shallam
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 250
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| After reading the comments of others I aggree that a very strong alternative is calling the flop and betting the turn (although I'd be aware that the 9 card fills in an OES draw). The downside of the call flop/lead turn play that you charge the second opp less for his his draw (raising the flop charges him 3 or 4 calling only 2). |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
anthonya530
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 368 Location: Chapin SC
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:45 pm Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. |
|
|
| shallam wrote: | | BTW, I don't think that going into passive mode is terrible. Entirely understandable IMHO. |
I think it's 100% terrible if you're playing 6 players or less and you passively lmp in. Sure, you can limp along if there's others limping at a passive preflop table. But first in ? Hell no. In fact, that's one of the things I'm looking for in trying to identify worthwhile opponents.
And post flop ? Not sure when that would be "understandable" either. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
shallam
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 250
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:34 pm Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. |
|
|
| anthonya530 wrote: | | shallam wrote: | | BTW, I don't think that going into passive mode is terrible. Entirely understandable IMHO. |
I think it's 100% terrible if you're playing 6 players or less and you passively lmp in. Sure, you can limp along if there's others limping at a passive preflop table. But first in ? Hell no. In fact, that's one of the things I'm looking for in trying to identify worthwhile opponents.
And post flop ? Not sure when that would be "understandable" either. |
He's in the BB. So none of these comments are relevant in this case PF.
Postflop I was merely proving a explanation for why he might have gone into passive mode. If you read my entire post you'll see that I recommend 3 betting the flop. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7267 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Preflop I think the check is fine - in some games you are likely enough to have people dominated so raising would be better, but you are also putting more money in the pot with bad position. Probably doesn't matter a whole lot since you'll just be betting right out for value if you hit the flop.
I would reraise the flop. It's obviously unlikely he has AK, but may very well have KJ or K9. KT is very possible but most players who would limp under the gun with KT are the type of players who are more likely to slowplay that a little more. Of course it should not be slowplayed and I myself might limp with that hand in some games and then pound the heck out of on the flop too.
Exact same can be said for TT except that it's slightly more likely to be slowplayed (but still shouldn't be).
If the player were particularly aggressive I'd think there were a good chance he had a good draw here, or just had KJ, so don't mind leading the turn again. Of course you're never "committed" to doing anything because you showed aggression. I'd do it simply for value and/or not giving a free card.
As for getting tricky to avoid "bloating the pot" and giving correct odds to draw on the turn, I'm not sure about that. Even if you just call they are getting correct odds for flushes and open ended straights, so you might as well put in more money when you're ahead. Even if you raise you won't be giving correct odds for gutshots. That leaves hands that have made one pair to the T or 3, like AT, T9, A3 etc. You are just about giving them the right price to call on the turn by raising.
Personally, I'm a little more interested with getting more value when I'm ahead than trying to make someone else make a mistake. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7267 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. |
|
|
| shallam wrote: | | While you have a strong hand, it is just a pair and when someone raises you have to at least consider the possibility that you are beat. |
Flop raises are cheap and the first 2 things I consider are K with a weaker kicker, or getting aggressive with a draw.
| shallam wrote: | | If your opp caps or raises the turn, I'd then go into passive check-call mode. |
My opponent is never getting an opportunity to cap the turn against me! But I agree with you that the turn is where it's appropriate to slow down and get more passive. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7267 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: Sometimes I fall in to passive mode and don't know why.. |
|
|
| anthonya530 wrote: | | I think it's 100% terrible if you're playing 6 players or less and you passively lmp in. Sure, you can limp along if there's others limping at a passive preflop table. But first in ? Hell no. |
Since we are neither at a shorthanded table nor first in, I don't see how your comments are relevant. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
|