|
|
| Author |
Message |
nsidestrate Suited's Love Monkey
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 22457
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:26 pm Post subject: SharkDAQ vote |
|
|
This is a follow-up to jflecther's proposal that we open SharkDAQ up to $55 and $109 buy-in freezeout MTTs. The rules would otherwise be unchanged, expect that we would allow runners to buy into these tourneys as well as the 100k and the Million.
I am proposing that we retain the 5% tax. I've looked at the prize pools and don't believe that the tax has significant effect on the split. Using the numbers posted in the main DAQ thread, the worst case for a stakee taking a 50/50 split would be 11th place. In the $55 the tax would mean a $151.56 payday for 11th instead of a $168.40 payday on a straight split. A first place finish would see roughly $13,600 not subject to the tax and $340 subject to the tax. Even a 6th place finish would see 90% of the prize money not subject to the split. In my opinion the split will have virtually no impact on the player's bottom line -- even less than the impact in the Million because the fields are smaller and so much of the prize pool is on the final table.
Please vote "YES" to allow our stakees to play these two buy-in levels or "NO to prevent it. You will receive one vote per share held. You may vote anytime before 11:59 pm January 11th. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bullajami Uber Squid
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 8838 Location: Mrs. Bull's Doghouse
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LDorey
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 604 Location: Springfield, PA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emmapeel 2K Club
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 2533 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes
First time I've seen SharkDaQ. Big thread to read about it. If it did include $55 tournaments maybe even I might be able to play in the future.
Gonna read the big thread now...
EP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
McFoldem 1K Club
Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 1566 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thew92
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 851 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, Anything to get the DAQ more action |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
taz115 Hzamm9rd, Yo!!!
Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 8436 Location: Edmonton, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes
And this will put me into action more often fwiw |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rayrns 1K Club
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 1004
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes
Ray |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Damo_1 PauliF Fan Club
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 1042 Location: Playing sets fast
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
krazytxan Texas Matriarch
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 4578
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
toronexti 53o
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 4171
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes i suppose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmosis21 SuperDuperNova
Joined: 22 Jan 2004 Posts: 1883
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nsidestrate Suited's Love Monkey
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 22457
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm inclined to vote yes, but I'm concerned about the $109s. The one running now looks to have a much stronger field than the Million with much less upside. I'm much more comfortable with the $55s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fumseck Cannuque
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 Posts: 3306 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jfletcher Will work for food
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 3162
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes.
As for the fields being stronger in the $109s, I still believe that any player approved by the DAQ committee is +ev in just about any online tourney. It's a question of how +ev. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|