|
|
| Author |
Message |
Adman
Joined: 26 Dec 2006 Posts: 13 Location: Pacific poker
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:34 pm Post subject: How far can you go with "ABC" style poker. |
|
|
Hi Terry, I just loved you book, as far as I am concerned it is a classic already. Thank you for imparting your knowledge with us!
My question is fairly self explanatory. How far up the limits do you think a solid TAG somewhat ABC player without a ton of moves can go before his somewhat predictable style is unable to win any longer?
I am a winning player up to 5/10 (roughly 28/18/2) but some of the higher limit games that I watch just look so tough with people raising the turn all the time with gutshots, flush draws, bottom pair, A high, nothing, all sorts of junk that I am almost positive I would be laying down to yet these guys call down with as little as K high a lot of the time. It also looks as though once in a hand they virtually never fold. I have never been comfortable (even after half a million hands) calling down with Ace high except in very specific circumstances. I think my post flop game is pretty fit or fold although I do check raise draws etc in heads up blind defense situations and of course I raise for free cards and make all the "standard" moves. I also generally tend to fold when I get 3 bet if I totally miss the flop, I've found bluff check raises etc just end up in being called down with A high which does you no good when you hold KQ or QJ etc.
I guess my question is do you think a player who is somewhat "straight forward" and is not super tricky can ever make it in the higher games? I have a feeling that if I ever tried to move up I would just get run over with sheer aggression. Don't get me wrong, I'm pretty happy being just a lowish limit grinder and I don't actually think I would like to play really high because I would hate the huge variance. Just a hypothetical question really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TerryBorer
Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 28 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Adman -
Thanks for your compliments on the book. We're really glad you found it useful.
| Quote: | | How far up the limits do you think a solid TAG somewhat ABC player without a ton of moves can go before his somewhat predictable style is unable to win any longer? |
Pretty far, although I found 10/20 a big step up from 5/10. A tight aggressive style is a great base to start from.
Beating higher-limt games means reacting to your new opponents, not striving to be like them. You're tight, so you will often have enough to pick off bluffs. Aggressive players often don't react enough and will just keep firing off bluffs.
Starting to play some bad hands aggressively (like some of them do) isn't going to work; it isn't your style so you'll be way out of your comfort zone. You will need to vary your play sometimes and bluff more (to play opposite to your tight image).
I see a lot of excellent players in 30/60 who play a nearly straightforward games. They read well and stay out of borderline situations.
So I see no reason why you couldn't win at 10/20 with some incremental adjustments.
| Quote: | | I'm pretty happy being just a lowish limit grinder and I don't actually think I would like to play really high because I would hate the huge variance. |
I think this is a great point and I'm glad you've found your niche. In Your Worst Poker Enemy Dr. Schoonmaker talks about a psychological bankroll. This is the point at which the stakes and the swings become too much for a player. Exceed that limit at your own peril. I don't play the biggest games because the players are so tough and the swings are too large for me.
Congrats on being a winning player - this is a big accomplishment. As I've said before, the vast majority of players lose (especially in a 5/10 limit short-handed game).
Good luck at the tables!
-- Terry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LawrenceMak
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
As we say a lot in our book, being +ev in any game is a very, VERY good achievement. Don't play in a higher game just for your ego.
If you want to improve, you will have to loosen up a bit and try some hands out of your comfort range. See the results and analyze what you did. Then decide if you want to add an Ace-high call-down or a 98s 3-bet in your arsenal.
Barry has some very good ideas about how to improve in his Advanced limit Hold'em Strategy book.
My personal opinion on poker and in life, is to figure out what you're good at and do that. =) If 5/10 matches your style, risk tolerance and bankroll and you are making money at it, i say stick to it.
But if you are determined to play in a higher limit, willing to work on your game and can stand higher variance, i think it definately can be done.
Lawrence |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kpr16
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 596 Location: Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just wanted to add that I think a straight forward style can win even higher than 10/20, but that it requires much better game selection to do so. Just something to keep in mind.
I've had a lot better results playing 30/60 and 50/100 once I was able to get out of my comfort zone and start making lighter 3-bets and see most showdowns when the pot gets HU. I'm now the guy starting the games instead of chasing bad players around.
Kyle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adman
Joined: 26 Dec 2006 Posts: 13 Location: Pacific poker
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi KPR16, thanks for the advice. I remember purchasing your 10/20 limit videos ages ago from a site called Donkit. I was pretty surprised the other day when I was just browsing the full tilt lobby (I don't actually play there) and saw you playing Gehrig heads up at 50/100. I watched for a while and you seemed to be doing pretty well. Isn't Gehrig supposed to be some kind of heads expert? Isn't there easier opponents you could be playing? Anyway well done on your progress, I know I could never handle the variance of 50/100, it takes balls and real skill to play that high against quality opposition! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kpr16
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 596 Location: Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't claim to have great game selection, but I rarely quit people when winning, and I definitely saw him make some horrible adjustments against me (or just play some hands poorly).
That's not to say I would have kept playing him if I saw a fish waiting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|