|
|
| Author |
Message |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6932 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:11 pm Post subject: Hand Reading Gravity |
|
|
I have noticed a bit of a leak in my game and I think it is psychological rather than technical. When I put my opponent on a hand, I will tend to put then on a hand either slightly better or slightly worse than what I have. I don't always subconsciously consider that I am 'way ahead' or 'way behind' (I put these in quotation marks because they don't mean what they usually mean in thi context).
For example, If I have Aces and I am raised on a turn of ( ) then I will consider the possibility that they have top pair or a draw and I am ahead or that they have spiked two pair with KJ or J9 and I am behind. However, if I had 99 on the same turn I would consider more seriously the possibility of a straight or a higher set.
Or the opposite, I will call down an aggressive player with Ace high and then feel really stupid when I see I was drawing dead to a flopped set all along. I assumed they either had one pair or they were bluffing.
Has anybody else experienced this problem?
Last edited by Piemaster on Tue May 15, 2007 4:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlamedaMike 2K Club
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 2042 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure that it is a problem. When you make a read you need to go with it.
I think it is natural to use your hand as a base point. You have a straight, what can beat you? Then see if the facts kind of jell with the action.
I am not all that good at reading a bunch of hands - sometimes I am dead on and sometimes I am way off.
It would be interesting to see what more experieced players have to say.
------- this hand --------
A weak and loose player was in front of me - I think he was BB or EP - in any event I was MP with AKs and naturally I raised. The flop was King high (K96) and he checked and I bet - I know that the called, maybe one other may have. Anyway, the turn was uneventfully (2 or 3) and he bet into me. I now raised him. He called. The river was an 8 and I figured it was a blank so when he checked I naturally bet. He now ck/r me. I called and he showed K8o for two pair.
-- I was lost, I had no idea why he raised me on the turn. --- I almost checked behind on the river in case he had turned 2 pair. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
niin ITH Software Programmer
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 4489
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think what he's saying is that, given two identically played hands on identical boards, the hand range he puts his opponent on changes with what his hand is.
If you think about it, the hand range should be the same in both cases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
janeg Regina Canada
Joined: 04 Oct 2004 Posts: 5112 Location: Somewhere down the crazy river
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:59 pm Post subject: Re: Hand Reading Gravity |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | I have noticed a bit of a leak in my game and I think it is psychological rather than technical. When I put my opponent on a hand, I will tend to put then on a hand either slightly better or slightly worse than what I have. I don't always subconsciously consider that I am 'way ahead' or 'way behind' (I put these in quotation marks because they don't mean what they usually mena in thi context.
For example, If I have Aces and I am raised on a turn of ( ) then I will consider the possibility that they have top pair or a draw and I am ahead or that they have spiked two pair with KJ or J9 and I am behind. However, if I had 99 on the same turn I would consider more seriously the possibility of a straight or a higher set.
Or the opposite, I will call down an aggressive player with Ace high and then feel really stupid when I see I was drawing dead to a flopped set all along. I assumed they either had one pair or they were bluffing.
Has anybody else experienced this problem? |
I think you have a piece of my brain, Pie
I do this all the time Pie and kick myself for doing it as in the hand reviews, where I can control the speed of the action and pay closer attention, the betting pattern and the type of player often make it obvious unless the opponent is tricky or very passive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6932 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| niin wrote: | I think what he's saying is that, given two identically played hands on identical boards, the hand range he puts his opponent on changes with what his hand is.
If you think about it, the hand range should be the same in both cases. |
Exactly
I don't know why I do it, it seems to be something subconscious, but I'm glad I'm not the only one. I think somehow i need to run my thought process in a different order. Assign a hand range, then work out if i am ahead rather than the other way around. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
janeg Regina Canada
Joined: 04 Oct 2004 Posts: 5112 Location: Somewhere down the crazy river
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, when I review I think about betting pattern, player type and their possible hand range but at the table I never seem to put all three together and hand range is usually the one I miss, I notice action-> loose/tight -> board and then take my action
Just thought of something, d'uh, I'm doing it backward! Thinking order should be player type->hand range->board->action ... now gotta see if I can break old habits! New sticky note on desktop today  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlamedaMike 2K Club
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 2042 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | | niin wrote: | I think what he's saying is that, given two identically played hands on identical boards, the hand range he puts his opponent on changes with what his hand is.
If you think about it, the hand range should be the same in both cases. |
Exactly
I don't know why I do it, it seems to be something subconscious, but I'm glad I'm not the only one. I think somehow i need to run my thought process in a different order. Assign a hand range, then work out if i am ahead rather than the other way around. |
That is what I meant to say - but, I still think that it is natural that you would do a different read based upon your hand value.
I understand what is being said and you should come to the same read against the same player with the same board if your reads are consistent.
Reads are about using information and knowing your hand value naturally affects your read in my opinion, but what do I know - just a guess.
In one hand I had KK and raised a bunch of limpers. A good player called me and knows that I will sometimes have an overpair or 2 suited high cards and that I would push a O/C w/flush draw the same - his read against me was that I had two overcards this time and not AA/KK. His read was more based upon him wanting to call me than what I most likely had.
I am not sure if this is related, but it looks like he is doing the same that you are.
My reads mostly suck but once in a while I nail'em. I had AA and my read was that the floped a straight but I could not fold my AA - he flopped a straight with 8T. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
niin ITH Software Programmer
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 4489
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | Exactly
I don't know why I do it, it seems to be something subconscious, but I'm glad I'm not the only one. I think somehow i need to run my thought process in a different order. Assign a hand range, then work out if i am ahead rather than the other way around. |
Yeah, this is how you have to do it, I think... try to figure out a range based on how he played as well as how he responded to how you played (which takes into account what you feel he thinks you have), then see how your hand holds up to that range; this goes further, too, in that if the range you put him on seems weak on the given board, then you might be able to get him to fold, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlamedaMike 2K Club
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 2042 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking of reads -
Here is a read and maybe it is too easy in that there are two few choices.
I had AK EP and raised. The flop was 4TK rainbow, I bet, 1 called and I was now raised (now HU). What could she have to raise me after I raised PF?
Initial read - Maybe a K and was checking to see if I had a smaller pair.
I raised, and she re-raised.
New read - I think she most likely has TT, KTs or 44. Since she did not 3-bet the flop I have eliminated hands like AA, and KK
A King hits the Turn and I now bet and she raises. (this bet was because if she had AA and was slowplaying, unlikely, I was now ahead).
New read - she has TT
River is a blank, I check and she bets? Call or fold?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Piemaster Author of THE POKER MINDSET
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 Posts: 6932 Location: London
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You can't possibly fold this ever ever ever. You may be beat, you may be ahead of a something like KQ or be tying with another AK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlamedaMike 2K Club
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 2042 Location: Alameda, CA
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | | You can't possibly fold this ever ever ever. You may be beat, you may be ahead of a something like KQ or be tying with another AK. |
Well, I did not fold and like I said she showed TT - as long as my play was correct then I am happy.
I guess reads are not worth much at low limit if you are not going to act on them and maybe we should not.
Lately, I have re-read a bunch of material on strategy and I have come to the conclusion (albeit late in the game) that so much depends on what you think the other player has in making a decision.
You post a hand for review and you get some ideas on how you played the hand after the fact and with even less knowledge than you had at the table.
All the material (books and articles) recommend your action depending on what you think the other player has - | Quote: | | I work with IBM consultants and when you ask them a question they always say 'it depends'. So much so that it has become an industry joke. Then they will give you some suggestions given some specific circumstances for that one time. Poker is the same - it's depends. |
If they are aggressive do this, if they are passive do this, if they want a free card do this, if you think you are ahead do this, if you think you are behind do this, if you think that their raise was light 3-bet, if next to act raise or fold depending on what you think that the raised/called with.
it has taken me a long time to verbalize something that I knew all along - that poker is situational and you need to know your opponents - just playing your cards will not get you very far (level 1 thinking).
But, no one really tells you how to come to the think part. That you have to figure out on your own. When you do that you then become a good poker player.
Observation and a good memory helps; I'm to poor to even pay attention and my memory has holes in it.
For example read pages 270-272 of TOP.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wynton Sharkapalooza 2 MVP
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 5575 Location: NY
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm skeptical this is occurring, or that it qualifies as an kind of leak.
First of all, hero's hand does affect the range of the villain's hand to at least some extent, simply by eliminating a couple of possible cards.
Second, the hand that is "slightly better" or "slightly worse" may often be the hand that the opponent most likely has.
And some hands simply get disguised better, like when someone makes a straight on the turn and they have 107, or when they get trips with a small pair.
My hunch is that, on a subconscious level, Pie, you are taking into account other factors that affect the villain's hand range. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fast Eddy 1K Club
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 1061
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I play a weekly game with 7 guys and last week I got knocked out and was watching the guys finish the sit-n-go. I noticed one of the loose/aggressive players always puts people on hands that are weaker than they actually have while I tend to put people on stronger hands than they actually have. I think it's caused by assuming others think and strategize like us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrxc
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 97
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: Re: Hand Reading Gravity |
|
|
| Piemaster wrote: | I have noticed a bit of a leak in my game and I think it is psychological rather than technical. When I put my opponent on a hand, I will tend to put then on a hand either slightly better or slightly worse than what I have. I don't always subconsciously consider that I am 'way ahead' or 'way behind' (I put these in quotation marks because they don't mean what they usually mean in thi context).
For example, If I have Aces and I am raised on a turn of ( ) then I will consider the possibility that they have top pair or a draw and I am ahead or that they have spiked two pair with KJ or J9 and I am behind. However, if I had 99 on the same turn I would consider more seriously the possibility of a straight or a higher set.
Or the opposite, I will call down an aggressive player with Ace high and then feel really stupid when I see I was drawing dead to a flopped set all along. I assumed they either had one pair or they were bluffing.
Has anybody else experienced this problem? |
Perhaps you should start your "read" process by begining with the opponents preflop ranges instead of your hand's strength. It is natural (and correct) for players to identify their hand's strength based on the type of flop that comes. However, this can flow very easily into formulating what your opponent holds without any further evidence (action). Also, i think reading opponents can be an illusion to some players where instead of logically and rationally putting someone on a hand, they put someone on a hand based on what gives them the most outs or highiest probability to "make it right over the long run". Somehow, they trick themselves and talk themselves into making the read seem probable. Something like, 'Only AK and AJ have me beat here and I only have to win once every 4 times to make this river call correct." Sure, it is logical, but are you rational about it? This player may be the tightest postflop player at the table, only going to showdown when he knows he has it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TShadyBaby
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 40 Location: Muncie
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wynton makes a valid point about the your cards narrows down the hands of your opponent.
I agree with Fast Eddy quite a few players make this mistake including myself. By thinking if they are a good player they must play hands a certain way. It may seem like a small hole in your game but if you combine it with another small mistake it becomes a black hole. For example being to rigid on your reads of an opponent in a hand. This was a major hole in my game.
The second problem that combines with the first to make a huge hole in your game.
Which became the most important thing I learned after preflop hand selection. One players style of play or a particular style of play isn't always the correct way to play every situation. Not all of your opponents think logically or they may be reading the situation completely different for you because you have decided to put them on a precise hand. I had to except that you cannot always place an opponent on a particular hand or a small range of hands. I increased the range of hands I put my opponents on. I fold more often and take what most of us would call bad beats. On occasion I throw away best hand it happens.
I would say this is both a psychological and technical problem or I maybe combining those two holes in my game. I think they are related and feed off of each other.
You must be able to take in all the info avalible for every round and process it to bet, call, raise, or fold. At least that is what I am trying to do.
Any suggestions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|