|
|
| Author |
Message |
MXRider Slim Shady
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 4922 Location: Have it your way!
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: Flop Decision |
|
|
no reads on this table as I only sat down roughly an orbit ago.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
Hero ($26.10)
MP ($25.50)
CO ($25)
Button ($4.40)
SB ($29.70)
BB ($24.65)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with A , J .
Hero raises to $0.85, MP calls $0.85, 1 fold, Button calls $0.85, SB calls $0.75, BB calls $0.60.
Flop: ($4.25) 8 , Q , 9 (5 players)
SB bets $3, BB calls $3, Hero??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaydreb
Joined: 29 Apr 2004 Posts: 545
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I probably just call because you're getting a great price on your draw, although a raise or even a push can't be that wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taardvark 1K Club
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1075 Location: Fremont, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Without a read on villian or established table image I'd call here with a ton of outs. Against some players I'd reopen this but you don't know if this is the type of opponent that will freeze up or one that will make a big move and bet you off a hand you want to continue with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emmapeel 2K Club
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 2533 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm worried that SB might have a big hand here. Betting into 4 opponents including the pre-flop raiser shows a lot of strength. With a flush draw and a straight draw we are doing good but not if we are up against a set.
I think I'm just calling here. The odds to call are 3-1 and we should win enough in implied odds to make calling a good play.
There is still a lot of play in this hand, there are two players to act still and the turn may take some thought too especially if the board pairs.
Re-raising to say $14 is another option. I'm concerned about the SB though and I think calling is safer.
EP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scully
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 650 Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think a non-shove raise is a bad idea personally. There's currently $10 in the pot and your have around $25 behind. A re-raise would need to be to $12 minimum, so that's pretty much half your stack in so you're committed to getting it all in. Given the action to date I can't believe that, if the raise is called, the pot will then get then get checked down, so you'll probably have to call all in on the turn. Raising for half your stack and then folding just sucks.
I would advocate either a call, as the pot odds are good enough to warrant it and then you can still get away from this on the turn without spewing half your stack, or a shove. You probably have 12 clean outs (OK 9 if villain holds KJ), plus possibly 3 more to the Ace although these may be doubtful.
If weighted as 9 definite clean outs to the flush, 3 probables to the straight (so let's weight that down to 2 outs) plus 3 possibles to the A (so let's weight that down to 1 out). Overall if you work on the basis that you have 12 outs, using the 4x rule of thumb you're 48% to win the hand. Throw some fold equity into the calculations as well and I think this is a +EV shove.
Which line you choose is then villain dependent. If they're going to shut down if your flush comes on the turn, get it in now. If not, call. As in this instance we have no read I personally would shove. This is perhaps a personal thing to help set up a false LAG/maniac image that might help me get paid off in later hands.
Overall it's a style thing I guess, but a normal size raise, IMO, is not good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scully
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 650 Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've just referred to PNLH (how sad is this - I have a copy in my bookcase at work for some light lunchtime reading) and with 12 outs the probability of winning the hand is 43.37%. If the A is simply not considered an out and we think we have 11 discounted outs the probability is 40%.
40% is getting a bit marginal maybe as we'd need more fold equity to make it a +EV play, and given the raise and the call I'm not sure that we'd get that much.
Maybe a flat call is best, although on reflection if you call and then starting raising a spade turn you might as well play with your hand face up.
I'm still undecided - it'd probably depend on my mood at the time!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taardvark 1K Club
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1075 Location: Fremont, CA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emmapeel wrote: | | I'm worried that SB might have a big hand here. EP |
Really? If SB has a really big hand why lead out? Why not check to the original raiser and let them open the pot and then do an oky doke and put in a big reraise? I think SB has a hand, I just don't think it's much more than maybe middle pair. I don't think they have J10 here but it's certainly possible. I think leading out with middle pair on this board is a likely play and will scare away some hands that would call pre flop that didn't hit big. Also, if they start getting callers or raises the hand is defined and a lot easier to dump. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Soultwister
Joined: 19 May 2006 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even while I can be owned totally by donking into with the nuts because I love raising donkleads, my standard line here would be to just call.
Jaydreb hit the mark here, which is that you are getting a great price on your draw, and further, you got position.
I do not often see someone donk/fold into a million people on such a board texture, so I think villain is leading here with the intention to donk-call or donk-3bet. So fold equity is very low in my eyes, while your pot equity is still bloody great. I would definitely choose to just call here.
And calling will not scare the other player out yet, which is pretty nice with good pot equity here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jfletcher Will work for food
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 3160
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about a minraise? Sure, some folks might see that as weak and 3-bet OTT, but others would be just curious enough to call and see what you're up to, and then check to you on the turn. Now you've got yourself a free card with your draw!
I know it's probably not as good as a flat call (my first preference) or a push (also OK), but I think it would be OK agaisnt certain passive opponents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emmapeel 2K Club
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 2533 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Taardvark wrote: | | emmapeel wrote: | | I'm worried that SB might have a big hand here. EP |
Really? If SB has a really big hand why lead out? Why not check to the original raiser and let them open the pot and then do an oky doke and put in a big reraise? I think SB has a hand, I just don't think it's much more than maybe middle pair. I don't think they have J10 here but it's certainly possible. I think leading out with middle pair on this board is a likely play and will scare away some hands that would call pre flop that didn't hit big. Also, if they start getting callers or raises the hand is defined and a lot easier to dump. |
Personally I think SB leading out into the pot with middle pair is terrible. What does this hope to achieve? If we are re-raised we fold, if we are called then we are likely beat, and if we are called but improve then we still might be second best with a tough hand still to play. All of this out of position too. And if the plan is to take down the pot then why have a hand at all?
What SB will do is the most important thing though and it doesn't have to be a good play just the most likely play. Betting into the pre-flop raiser is certainly a play made with something like 88 here. It is the play advocated in Super-system and a lot of other places too. It certainly can't be discounted as the likely play of the SB.
Checking is interesting though with a big hand for SB as there are 4 opponents. If UTG then bets and gets a call or two we can then check-raise all of them for more value. And since we might have only a flush draw we may even get calls from weaker hands.
I think checking with say a set in the SB has merit and it is hard for me to say if this is better to betting out or not. I think both plays candidates for being best and it might be a situational thing.
As for what SB has when he bets out, I would guess this is likely to be a set, JT or 98 the majority of the time. It would be good to hear other opinions on this though.
EP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Soultwister
Joined: 19 May 2006 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Really? If SB has a really big hand why lead out? Why not check to the original raiser and let them open the pot and then do an oky doke and put in a big reraise? |
In a pot vs a million people, it is a mistake to NOT lead out with a big hand here. Most people are not stupid enough to make a cbet here without a good hand vs 4 other people.
If SB has a set or straight here, leading out here is almost always the optimal play, because this is a board you don't want people to check behind on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jfletcher Will work for food
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 3160
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Soultwister wrote: | | Quote: | | Really? If SB has a really big hand why lead out? Why not check to the original raiser and let them open the pot and then do an oky doke and put in a big reraise? |
In a pot vs a million people, it is a mistake to NOT lead out with a big hand here. Most people are not stupid enough to make a cbet here without a good hand vs 4 other people.
If SB has a set or straight here, leading out here is almost always the optimal play, because this is a board you don't want people to check behind on. |
While I see that point, isn't the other side of the coin that, with so many players to act, at least one of them hit this flop enough to bet? Just playing devil's advocate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nutjob MS Paint Pro
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 3753 Location: somewhere dark and wet
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Who you fools donk-betting? He's read Matthew's book (or so I've heard) EZ push. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chrisjp Mr. Lovable
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 5003 Location: Round Rock, TX and Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Soultwister wrote: | | If SB has a set or straight here, leading out here is almost always the optimal play, because this is a board you don't want people to check behind on. |
I agree completely, but most would not make this play. In fact hardly anyone would. These donk leads are often weakish made hands or draws. So I'll put the donk bettor on precisely that.
I'd only call here. You might get a free card on the turn when a blank comes. If the stacks were larger I might make a min raise and hope the leverage play coupled with a bet on the turn might win the pot unimproved.
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taardvark 1K Club
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1075 Location: Fremont, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jfletcher wrote: | | Soultwister wrote: | | Quote: | | Really? If SB has a really big hand why lead out? Why not check to the original raiser and let them open the pot and then do an oky doke and put in a big reraise? |
In a pot vs a million people, it is a mistake to NOT lead out with a big hand here. Most people are not stupid enough to make a cbet here without a good hand vs 4 other people.
If SB has a set or straight here, leading out here is almost always the optimal play, because this is a board you don't want people to check behind on. |
While I see that point, isn't the other side of the coin that, with so many players to act, at least one of them hit this flop enough to bet? Just playing devil's advocate. |
This is the line I am talking about. I certainly am not going to check if I think it gets checked around but I really feel that someone bets here and it's a great check raise opportunity. If the preflop action was different I'd definitely lead but someone has to have hit a piece of this and will bet or had a strong preflop hand and wants to protect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|