|
|
| Author |
Message |
mconstab
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 443 Location: Warwickshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: Calling a re raise pre flop |
|
|
I'm a little unsure as to the factors for calling a re raise pre flop.
For example:
Blinds $15/$30, 9 handed
Hero in CO with 78s
PRE FLOP
5 folds, hero raises to $90, BTN raises to $270, hero?
The total pot is now $405 so we're paying $180 into $405 to make the call.
From this point on what factors would determine whether hero called or folded? I realise we are more likely to call against a loose aggro type with a hand like 78s as his range is wide and we have good implied odds if we hit the flop. I guess I'm more concerned as to how we make the call from a pure price perspective. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
ImBetterDude
Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Posts: 747 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not a cash game player, so take my advice with a grain of salt.
What matters most to me here is the size of your stack and your opponents. Calling with a speculative hand like this will end up with you folding to a flop bet 4/5 times, so you need to make sure that the 1/5 times that you do flop a hand worth playing that you can gain sufficient rewards to make up for the 4/5 times you would lose. So make sure your opponent has large stack, and that your stack is close to equally large; I'm thinking 100 BB at least. Remember, implied odds don't mean shit if you and your opponent are playing very short.
Another thing to consider is the image of this player...is he a rock? Is he hyper aggro? This will help you determine how to play an OESD or Flush Draw on the flop. If he's aggro, check/raising might be a good option. If he's a rock, maybe check calling would make more sense.
Again, I'm a pretty piss poor cash game player, but this is advice I've heard along the way. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Taardvark 1K Club
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1137 Location: Fremont, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ImBetterDude wrote: | | What matters most to me here is the size of your stack and your opponents. |
+1 |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
the_hawk Chelsea FTW!
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 4449
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ImBetterDude wrote: | | I'm not a cash game player, so take my advice with a grain of salt.. |
I'm pretty sure this is a tourney question. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
cowboyfan
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 299 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Taardvark wrote: | | ImBetterDude wrote: | | What matters most to me here is the size of your stack and your opponents. |
+1 |
Also very important is position. I'm much more likely to call when it's a blind that re-raises so that I can see the flop action than I am against someone on the BTN.
What your image is to the table is also very important. Have you folded a couple of weak steal attempts after a re-raise? If so, you're much more likely to be played back at.
These are a few of the considerations. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
mconstab
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 443 Location: Warwickshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay so lets say villain has a stack of $3500 and hero has $3000, do the size of the stacks edge this towards a call?
The image side of this call I'm fine with and understand the opponent variables that factor into the call. The actual size of the raise is what's throwing me a bit. For example, if villain re raised to $370 instead of $270 how does this effect hero's action? |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
cowboyfan
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 299 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Absent any reads, this is a very tough call. You are getting the 12-15:1 odds that you need to make the call, but you will be check/folding the vast majority of the flops. I would prefer to make these kinds of calls with 3-4 people in the pot.
I would probably call, but IMO it's very marginal. If there were other people in the pot, I would call in a heartbeat. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
toronexti 53o
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 4240
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I realise we are more likely to call against a loose aggro type with a hand like 78s as his range is wide and we have good implied odds if we hit the flop. |
I personally would rather call against a TAG here than a LAG since you're implied odds are way higher (unless it's a spewtard).
Most of the time I'd just fold here, you're OOP with a weakish hand. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Raisindye
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 353 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="toronexti"] | Quote: |
Most of the time I'd just fold here, you're OOP with a weakish hand. |
which is a recipe for disaster |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Scully
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 729 Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been reading/watching a lot of Ed Miller's stuff recently and suited connectors come up a lot.
Essentially his take is that as you'll hit the flop hard so infrequently, you need another way to win the pot - i.e.: to steal it. This is a major reason for only playing these hands in position.
Slight caveat that I've been looking primarily at cash games, but I think that the rationale holds for tourneys - possibly more so where effective stacks are rarely going to be 100bb+ deep |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Taardvark 1K Club
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1137 Location: Fremont, CA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| toronexti wrote: | | Quote: | | I realise we are more likely to call against a loose aggro type with a hand like 78s as his range is wide and we have good implied odds if we hit the flop. |
I personally would rather call against a TAG here than a LAG since you're implied odds are way higher (unless it's a spewtard).
Most of the time I'd just fold here, you're OOP with a weakish hand. |
I also think you are going to have a much easier time figuring out where you are at post flop against a TAG. For instance, if you hit an eight with no draw on the flop and the betting is intense, your very likely not at all good against a TAG but against a LAG your top pair could very well be the best hand but to find out you put yourself in a lot of danger. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
mconstab
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 443 Location: Warwickshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cowboyfan wrote: | Absent any reads, this is a very tough call. You are getting the 12-15:1 odds that you need to make the call, but you will be check/folding the vast majority of the flops. I would prefer to make these kinds of calls with 3-4 people in the pot.
I would probably call, but IMO it's very marginal. If there were other people in the pot, I would call in a heartbeat. |
Could I ask where the 12-15:1 odds come from? |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
nsidestrate Suited's Love Monkey
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 22652
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the guy is LAG enough and you are willing to invest a lot of money to take the pot away when you hit nothing about 20% of the time, then you could call. If you are going to fold if you whiff every time, you should just fold now. It will put you in a real tough spot, because most of the time when you connect, you will either flop middle pair or catch a draw. Playing a draw OOP against an aggressive player isn't that much fun.
Add a blind who flat calls and I'm much more into it. If the guy who 3 bet me has been getting in my business a lot, I might call with a plan to check-raise any flop, but I think I'm substantially crazier than most of you. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Scully
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 729 Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mconstab wrote: | | cowboyfan wrote: | Absent any reads, this is a very tough call. You are getting the 12-15:1 odds that you need to make the call, but you will be check/folding the vast majority of the flops. I would prefer to make these kinds of calls with 3-4 people in the pot.
I would probably call, but IMO it's very marginal. If there were other people in the pot, I would call in a heartbeat. |
Could I ask where the 12-15:1 odds come from? |
The implied odds of taking his stack when you flop big |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
mconstab
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 443 Location: Warwickshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Scully wrote: | | mconstab wrote: | | cowboyfan wrote: | Absent any reads, this is a very tough call. You are getting the 12-15:1 odds that you need to make the call, but you will be check/folding the vast majority of the flops. I would prefer to make these kinds of calls with 3-4 people in the pot.
I would probably call, but IMO it's very marginal. If there were other people in the pot, I would call in a heartbeat. |
Could I ask where the 12-15:1 odds come from? |
The implied odds of taking his stack when you flop big |
Okay so that begs the question of why do I need 12-15:1 odds to make the call? Why not 9:1 or 10:1? What aspect of my hand determines that I need those specific odds? |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
|