Poker Forums : 500,000+ Poker Forum Posts
Texas Holdem Odds Calculator
Odds Chart & Calculators
Poker Rakeback
Rakeback Comparison
Support the Forum - Vulcan Poker Bonus
GET BONUS | VULCAN POKER REVIEW
FAQ  |   Search Forum  |  Watched Topics Memberlist  |  Usergroups  |  Register  |  Profile  |  Log in   |  Log in to check your private messages
100% / $50 + Free Gifts 100% / $500 100% / $500 + Free Gifts 100%/500 + Free Gifts 100% / $600 + Free Gifts
Article: Gambling and Taxes

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Internet Texas Hold'em Forum Index  -> Poker Law/ Legal Issues  | Search
Author Message
nukeduke
ITH BBQ Host Master


Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 3017
Location: Nashville

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:32 pm    Post subject: Article: Gambling and Taxes Reply with quote

For those of you who like pin head tax stuff Smile

I've bolded what I think are the interesting parts, nearer to the end.



Win or Lose, Gambling Activity May Affect Your Tax Return


By E. Lynn Nichols, CPA

The proliferation of Casinos, seen by many state and local governments as revenue raisers that are more palatable than new taxes, has brought a parallel increase in tax disputes between taxpayers and the IRS on two issues:

(1) The amounts of taxable winnings and deductible losses;

(2) The classification of the gambling activity as recreation, or a business undertaken with a profit motive.

Let's take the easy issue first. Gambling income is fully taxable . . . gambling losses may not exceed gambling winnings, and unless the taxpayer is engaged in the business of gambling those losses are not deductible in determining adjusted gross income. Recordkeeping is made somewhat easier by the computerized records maintained by many casinos for their slot players' activity cards. But what if all the wagering is not in a casino where the player is registered? The taxpayer is supposed to maintain a “contemporaneous record” of gambling activity to substantiate losses. But what if that wasn't done ? A recent decision of the U.S. Tax Court, Francis M. Gagliardi v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-10, relied in part on withdrawals from ATM machines along with the testimony of credible witnesses to establish that Mr. Gagliardi gambled as much as 20 hours a day, for as many as 250 days per year, and not always in casinos where he had a player's card. The court allowed all of his claimed losses.

In another recent dispute, the taxpayer was not able to prove she was entitled to more losses than the IRS allowed (in which the Service had given her the benefit of the doubt based on fragmented records). Kathleen Jackson had no contemporaneous record, no credible witnesses, and no argument other than that she must have lost more than she won, because she was deeper in debt at the end of the year than the beginning. (Kathleen Jackson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2007-373).

So . . . the first lesson for tax preparers is that the taxpayer should have reliable contemporaneous records to substantiate gambling losses. Without those records, supporting claimed losses will be an uphill battle.

The second issue is more complex. Is the taxpayer engaged in gambling as a trade or business ? The seminal decision . . . cited in all that have followed . . . is the Supreme Court's 1987 holding in Commissioner v. Groetzinger, 480 U.S. 23. Mr. Groetzinger had no other job than playing the horses. He spent up to 60 hours per week reading the Racing Form and attending races where he placed wagers, either at the track or off-track betting facility. The most recent taxpayer victory on this issue is Linda M. Myers v. Commissioner, T.C. Summ. Op. 2007-194. Unlike Mr. Groetzinger, she had other work, but only for about 25 hours per week. She spent 40 or more hours per week at various casinos playing slot machines. She had player's club records to support most of that activity. The Court applied the “nine factor” test usually reserved for Section 183 “hobby loss” disputes to find that Ms. Myers was engaged in her gambling activity with a profit motive.

How important is that determination ? Well, if the taxpayer is engaged in gambling as a business (with a profit motive) then gambling losses can be deducted against gambling winnings when determining adjusted gross income (AGI) instead of as itemized deductions where the losses would be subject to other limitations.

One final point . . . in a number of cases involving gambling income, the taxpayer has reported only amounts from Forms W-2G as income. Various Tax Court Judges, in particular, have insisted that there must be OTHER winnings as well. The theory being that anyone who gambles enough to win a major jackpot has probably won some minor jackpots as well.

The lesson for tax preparers in all this is that we should advise our clients of the rules, the winning arguments and the losers, and prepare returns that are supported by the client's records.
Back to top of Forum
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view    Internet Texas Hold'em Forum Index -> Poker Law/ Legal Issues All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Find More Poker Bonuses:


Powered by php.B.B 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 php.B.B Group

Forum Archive

Texas Holdem Strategy

|

Internet Poker Bonus & Review

|

Texas Holdem Odds Calculator

|

PokerStars Bonus

|

Party Poker Bonus Code

|

Internet Texas Hold'em offers the Best Poker Bonus Codes & most in-depth Poker Rooms Reviews. Click on the Internet Poker Room of your choice for a full review.

"The information and opinions in this site are for informational and entertainment purposes only and are provided solely as the author's opinion. The site is not intended for use in areas where this information and/or advertisements may be considered illegal. Check your federal, state, and local laws concerning the legality of gambling and online gambling in your area."

Visit Pokerwonks, our Poker Blog Community and Internet Poker Rankings, providing poker tournament player rankings

Copyright 2008 © Dimat Online :: Internet Texas Holdem