|
|
| Author |
Message |
Damien
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 456 Location: Donk Betting the Flop
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:05 pm Post subject: 88 in CO, multiway |
|
|
88 is unstoppable!!!!
Seriously, do I just dump this on the flop with so many players?
Full Tilt Poker
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $0.50/$1
8 players
Converter
Pre-flop: (8 players) Hero is CO with
UTG raises, UTG+1 calls, MP1 folds, MP2 calls, Hero calls, 2 folds, BB calls.
Flop: (10.5SB, 5 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP2 bets, Hero calls, BB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls.
Turn: (7.75BB, 5 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP2 bets, Hero calls, BB folds, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls.
River: (11.75BB, 4 players)
UTG checks, UTG+1 bets, MP2 calls, Hero folds, UTG folds.
Results:
Final pot: 13.75BB |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Stew21
Joined: 03 Oct 2006 Posts: 999 Location: Orlando, Fl
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If any one of the others play A-rag (at least suited) then yes, your 88 is dead in the water.
I think the same could be said for J-T or T-9.
I'm still learning as well (as you've seen from some of my other posts ) so I'm sure ther are better people than me to really answer this. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Ohjay
Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 972 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is an easy fold on the flop.
You only have 1 clean out if we presume you are behind already. The 8 of spades could likely give someone a flush, and people love playing aces(especially at the lower limits) so I think it's pretty safe to say you're behind already. And even if you'd get that miracle 8 of clubs, there's a chance a spade comes and gives someone a flush anyway, so the odds just aren't there to play this beyond the flop. Let it go...
There is another "interesting" bit in this hand as well, and that is pre-flop. I'm not sure I would call this preflop. If UTG is at least reasonable he probably has a big ace or a bigger PP than you, and you have 2 cold-callers and if they are reasonable as well they'll have hands which means trouble for you. Thinking about it, even with no reads I would fold 88 here.
With some good reads on 2 or 3 of the opponents I might lean towards calling if the read was favourable for a hand like this |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
the_hawk Chelsea FTW!
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 4447
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think ohjay has it. If the flop were rainbow i think you can peel one for the 2 outer getting 10:1 immediate and likely 14:1 barring a c/r. As it is i can dump this. A fold pre would be fine as well. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
the_hawk Chelsea FTW!
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 4447
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Looking at the hand again, the PFRer has checked the flop, which at this limit means there is quite likely some monkeying around to be expected behind you on the flop, As such i lean even more towards a fold. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Damien
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 456 Location: Donk Betting the Flop
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks guys, that all makes perfect sense. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Misunderstud 1K Club
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1683 Location: Here, stupid
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, I may be mad, and Hawk will probably tell me why, but for me this is a fold or reraise preflop. If I reraise (i.e. if UTG is known to raise light from that seat) I'm betting/raising 1 bettor (as played) on the flop and reassessing from there. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Damien
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 456 Location: Donk Betting the Flop
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it helps any, UTG is a pretty standard TAG: 16 / 11 / 2.2
I'm a little surprised that most of you are going with a preflop fold. It seems to me that given the amount of callers, it may be worth it just to try to hit a set on the flop. Is the fold a better option simply because of the likelyhood that somebody else has a higher pocket pair?
If you prefer a pre-flop fold here, which pocket pair would you call (or re-raise?) with? Would 99 be a different story? |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Misunderstud 1K Club
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1683 Location: Here, stupid
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it's worth 2 to hit a set on the flop, then it's worth 3.
With middle pairs you have to look at your hand, the number of callers, the players you're against and where the raise has come from. A 16/11 TAG UTG raiser will likely have a premium hand and with just 3 in the pot it's questionable whether you're getting enough value to play for a set with 88. And, of course, 88 is rarely going to win at SD UI, and will often be outdrawn. A better hand, worse players or more callers and you might lean towards a raise, but It really does depend on the conditions. I've raised 99 and folded TT in similar spots.
If in doubt, fold. If you never cold called anything you wouldn't be making a big mistake. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
omega man
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 253 Location: wolverhampton uk
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i believe ed miller and matthews book suggests calling when there are 3 people in the pot.
i call with any pair in late position pre flop but on the flop here i fold. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Misunderstud 1K Club
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1683 Location: Here, stupid
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| omega man wrote: | i believe ed miller and matthews book suggests calling when there are 3 people in the pot.
i call with any pair in late position pre flop but on the flop here i fold. |
That's what Matthew's chart has, yes, but that's a simple chart to cover a lot of complex scenarios. See ITH pp. 84-5 for other considerations that might suggest a fold. See also p. 102 (Deceptive plays), where you might sometimes raise instead. I don't think you'll make much calling an UTG raiser with 22 here. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Willem 2K Club
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 2685 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would also call this preflop. I don't like to pay 3 bets (when I also see the flop for 2 bets) to get in a 4-handed pot where I am folding the flop a fair amount of the time. (Like here) You might consider 3-betting if you have a chance to knock out some opponents but that's never happening here. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
Misunderstud 1K Club
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1683 Location: Here, stupid
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I dunno, maybe it's just a style thing, but I'm really not comfortable cold calling pocket pairs. (I'm not particularly comfortable cold calling anything, come to that, though on the odd occasions I do so it's usually with suited connectors.) It seems to me that with a medium pair in a multiway pot you're either playing for set value or you're not, since it's unlikely to end up being the best hand UI. And, if you are, you might just as well raise - if you're going to win a pot, make it a biggun. 88 and 3 in is pretty borderline, however, so I wouldn't argue all that strongly for or against any of the three alternatives (though personally I'd fold it in this example). |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
the_hawk Chelsea FTW!
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 4447
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Misunderstud wrote: | | so I wouldn't argue all that strongly for or against any of the three alternatives (though personally I'd fold it in this example). |
That.
All three choices are probably pretty close (and hence, obviously, roughly 0EV). I'll lean towards the lower-variance option.  |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
shallam
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 250
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Preflop.
The preflop call is marginal, I prefer folding. To attempt to work this out I like to do a little math. The odds of flopping a set or better are 7.5 to 1. So the question is will you win a pot big enough to justify all your misses. For math purposes I like to use 10 rather than 7.5 because it is a round number and should help to avoid exaggarating the strength of my hand. Remember some of the time you hit a set you will be outdrawn by a flush or a straight.
You need to cold call 2 SB, so by my math you need to expect to win at least 20sb when you win (remember you want a 10 to 1 ratio). There are 6 sb so far three players call two bets. Let's assume one other players call and there are no raises. That makes it 8 sb excluding yours.
Let's assume you flop a set and get one raise on the flop but only one layer of betting on the turn and river. On each round 50% of the players fold. On the flop 2 players fold, two call the raise. We now have 12 sb excluding your bets.
On the turn, one player folds one calls for one BB (2sb) giving us a total of 14 sb. On the river let's assume our lone player calls adding 2 sb for a total of 16sb. You need 20 but get only 16. I don't think the math works in your favor.
I realize that the one can question the assumptions at each round. If you cap the betting on the turn with three players you have enough value just based on one round. I purposefully use normal to slightly conservative scenarios. If the table play includes utter reckless post flop play you can adjust accordingly.
In general I like to play mid to small pocket pairs 99 on down for one bet PF. If I call and there is raise I can live with it, but I don't like calling two bets cold.
I prefer folding preflop.
You call. OK, so heading into the flop and lots of opps I'm looking to flop a set or better. If I don't I'm gonna need a really good reason to continue as 88 stinks as a drawing hand. No set, no bet, with only rare exceptions.
The Flop
I really don't like your call here at all. You were looking for a set and didn't get it. To call you really need a good reason, perhaps all undercards, or just one overcard that looks safe (e.g., a 9 ?), or maybe some type of straight draw. Here you have the opposite, both the A and the T are likely to have hit at least one opp. You might be up against a higher pocket pair. It's very likely that are beat, in facts it's likely you are beat by more than one person. You have no real draw except to a set. You are very unlikely to improve with only 2 outs to a set you are 23 to 1, you don't have nearly those odds EVEN if you throw in generous implied odds. There is also a flush draw, your 8s out might be no good. Are we really wanting to draw to one clean out ?
Finally, there is also the possibility of a raise behind you. GROSS!
Fold !
The Turn.
See above.
The River
Better late than never. You might consider calling one bet if there nobody behind you. But with a bet and a call, you know for sure the second player can't be bluffing.
You need a better hand to overcall than just call. A call is probably a fold, an overcall is screaming raging fold.
Summary.
I like your river fold. I think you should have folded on each of the other three rounds. Loose passive poker is a good way to lose money. |
|
| Back to top of Forum |
|
 |
|
|