Texas Holdem Strategy

chillin411 · Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 803 Location: Florida

http://www.internettexasholdem.com/poker-columnists/matthew-hilger-aka-mchilger/the-biggest-mistake-in-shorthanded-games/

"My book, Internet Texas Hold’em, focuses on limit hold’em at a full table of nine or ten players. I learned this game by playing in full ring games, but my real passion is playing in shorthanded games. I don’t play nearly as much online as I once did, but when I do, I play mostly shorthanded. Shorthanded play has more action, more hands, more strategy, more bluffing, and is simply more fun. It also is a lot more profitable."

Post any questions you may have for Matthew, or any comments you may have on the article below.

OgreMkV · Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 893 Location: Port Arthur, TX

How would you modify your starting hand chart to fit these situtations?

Just for the heck of it, I played a $1/$2 6 max game a couple of weeks back. I did well, finishing up about 5BB. However, that was the most stressful game I've ever played. Maybe later, I'll get used to it, but wow, the action was fast and furious.

Would your suggestions apply to any short-handed game (like the final 4 in an SnG)?

vinceaida · Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 2

am still amazed that most players simply do not understand basic shorthanded strategy, even at limits such as $50-$100. Let’s cut to the chase; the biggest mistake by players in shorthanded limit games is simply calling a raise against a lone opponent. This is often a mistake in full ring games, but in shorthanded games, it is absolutely essential to either reraise or fold. The one exception is when playing from the big blind.

Why the exception for the BB?

Vinceaida

torch · Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:11 am Post subject:

mchilger · Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 1:08 pm Post subject:

Also for the BB, you are out of position. This is the same from the SB, but a reraise from the SB ensures that you charge the big blind a high price for entering the pot. So I always either reraise or fold from the SB against a lone raiser and while in the big blind I will either call or reraise depending on a variety of factors - strength of my hand, position of raiser, previous action, quality of opponent, etc.

Ogre, starting hand guidelines are very dependant on your opponents, especially the type of opponent in the big blind. Creating guidelines for short-handed is much tougher to do than in a full ring game. But as a start, you can just take out the early position seats from my chart. For example, if you are 4-handed and you are first to act, this is very similar to playing in the cutoff in a full ring game when everyone has folded to you. THis is an over simplification, but it is a place to start with if beginning short-handed play.

Matthew

OgreMkV · Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 893 Location: Port Arthur, TX

Thanks, I thought it would be something like that. I couldn't quite decide whether to take out the early or late group.

I guess you could do either one depending on the table too.

Dire · 1K Club Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 1965

Very informative article! Not something I had even considered before.

KEVBO · Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 901 Location: Virginia

Great article Matthew! Wish you wouldn't have written it though Twisted Evil

I have used this strategy for as long as I can remember and everybody always chastized me for playing like this when in fact I always knew it was the correct way to play. I often was considered the maniac fish and would constantly have "know it all" players sit at my table for hours waiting for a big hand to try and "catch" me. Of course I usually abused them and was considered "lucky". This strategy also works well in full ring games if used in the right situations.

Remember your home game for ITH'rs a few months back? Of course I played a little crazy (I protected EVERY blind and raised w/ any 2 UTG Laughing

) just b/c it was a $1/$2 game and the atmosphere was fun, but you may remember seeing me use the strategy you discussed quite a bit, especially in the mid to late positions. You may also remember that I occassionally would attempt to blind steal with about any 2 cards (twice that night actually, once w/ QT and once w/ J6). This strategy works in a similar fashion. You: 1) have position and force your opponent to make a hand and 2) keep everybody off balance, especially ABC type players. Once an ABC type player figures out what your doing you already know exactly what adjustments they are going to make, so you just stay one step ahead of them. And of course your good hands ALWAYS get paid off.

I kept trying to tell people that there was a method to the madness, now they know!

- KEVBO -

MXRider · Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:38 am Post subject:

All I have to say is that this was probably the most informative article that I have read. I have been playing quite a bit of 6max lately profitably, however, by making this adjustment in my game, wow. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

darvon · Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:20 pm Post subject:

MrSmith · Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 716 Location: Donked up

Matthew, remove this article right now! It is too good to be online.

DTheater · Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:23 am Post subject:

with this strategy, are you not going to end up losing a ton of big pots with 2nd best hands?? i imagine it increases your variance even more?

Wynton · Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:30 am Post subject:

XxMagiciaNxX · Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 11 Location: Raising your blinds

I play a lot of short handed 5/10 NL. I wonder how much this article would apply to the short handed NL game. Usually when I call a raise, it is for the purpose of flopping a big hand, not because I have a big hand. For instance, if I am in position with 4 4, rarely would I even think about re-raising in this situation. I would try to flop a set against as many opponents as possible in order to maximize value. I know this article focused on Limit play, but do you have any insight as far as NL play goes? Would you employ the same strategy in a NL setting?

mchilger · Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2005 11:30 am Post subject:

Glad everyone has liked this article so much. I love short-handed play and will look into writing some more articles. I also hope to finally do a 2nd edition of ITH which will include a short-handed chapter (maybe late 2006).

Dtheater, I'm not sure this would actually increase your variance. Remember, you'll be playing a lot more pots headsup rather than 3 or 4 handed since the blinds will fold a lot - this will decrease your variance. The difference between calling and reraising might add a little bit more to the pot, but you run the risk of losing either way if you have 2nd best hand. By reraising though, you should be able to steal the pot more often on the flop and turn.

I wouldn't employ this strategy in a NL game. Just one example, you have 77 on the button and face a raise. I don't mind that the blinds enter the pot here since I am hoping to flop a set and win a big pot. Also, by reraising, I put myself at risk that my opponent will reraise me back forcing me to fold a hand that I want to see a flop with.

In NL you should be mixing it up more. You need to reraise with these "borderline" hands sometimes so that your opponents don't always put you on a premium pair, but at the same time I like to see a lot of flops with position in NL. There is a lot more opponent specific strategy in NL compared to a Limit guideline where I recommend either reraising or folding ALL the time.

Matthew

	Odds Chart & Calculators Rakeback Comparison	TRY THIS US FRIENDLY POKER ROOM!!	FREE POKER GIFTS \| VISIT PARTY POKER
Internet Texas Holdem Poker Forum Party Poker Bonus PokerStars Bonus Texas Holdem Strategy Internet Poker Bonus Poker Book Store
Poker Blogs Internet Poker Rankings
FAQ \| Search Forum \| Watched Topics Memberlist \| Usergroups \| Register \| Profile \| Log in \| Log in to check your private messages

Internet Texas Holdem

Poker Forum

Party Poker Bonus

PokerStars Bonus