|
|
| Author |
Message |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7222 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:00 pm Post subject: Book discussion for Professional No Limit Holdem |
|
|
| Post any questions here for discussion with other ITHers, or for one of the authors, Matt Flynn. Link to hand examples or post them here if directly relevant to a PNL concept. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Flynn
Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:32 pm Post subject: PNL1 |
|
|
hi all,
ask away!
matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maddogmike
Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 431
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Matt,
Your book is a big eye opener for me. Thanks for answering questions
I'm wondering how to approach a flopped set when the flop is single suited. I've seen these about 6 times in the past few weeks. Should I be aggressive on the flop to protect against draws, or should I be more careful against possible flopped flushes? In the following example, I had trouble deciding how committed I was...
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver Cards)
UTG ($13.55)
UTG+1 ($17.25)
MP1 ($49.20)
MP2 ($23.65)
CO ($20.15)
Button ($26.55)
Hero ($25.65)
BB ($57.30)
Preflop: Hero is SB with , .
5 folds, Button calls $0.25, Hero completes, BB checks.
Flop: ($0.75) , , (3 players)
Hero bets $0.75, BB calls $0.75, Button raises to $2.5, Hero ??
Button is loose and tends to spew chips. I like him. BB is tight, I'd rather not have him in the hand. Both have aggresion around 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silvershade
Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I will join in here but book only arrived yesterday so havent been able to read it all yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SittingDuck 1K Club
Joined: 07 Jul 2004 Posts: 1582
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
maddogmike,
I'm not Matt, but I'll put my 2 cents in...What read did you have on your opponent? Then as per the book think about the REM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7222 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Matt, I was wondering how you derived the basic math for the SPR strategy. Was it empirical estimates, or was it something fancier?
I understand the basic concepts - I've posted some very contrived examples in the past. This example is only semi-contrived:
You raise with AA or KK or AK in EP. You're called by one opponent in EP, and everyone else folds. You happen to know this opponent will only cold call with small/medium pocket pairs in EP, everything else he folds or reraises. He also knows you're tight and straightforward, especially UTG, but you will sometimes go all the way with an overpair or TPTK, but sometimes lay it down.
On the flop, if an A comes he will put you on AK. Otherwise he'll put you on AA/KK. You will always bet TPTK or an overpair. Then he will
- always raise all-in if he flops a set
- usually fold if he misses
- occasionally bluff raise all-in
So, how to come up with a target SPR for this player? If you are willing to call his all-in bets every time (ignoring the fact that he might stop bluffing if you did so), then your target SPR is probably going to be something around 4 or 5. The exact number would depend on bluffing probabilities, but the point is that if we plugged in some specific numbers we could come up with a specific SPR and therefore a specific raise amount (such as to $11 with $100 effective starting stacks) that would make this profitable.
But that's just one relatively easy math example. How did you come up with numbers for a more general case? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Flynn
Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:23 am Post subject: sets on flushed boards |
|
|
how likely is it that someone flopped a flush given that you're getting action? first part is how tight is opponent preflop? will he play suited aces? suited one-gappers? that gives you an idea of how many hands beat you. then if you get a lot of action you have a better idea of whether you're beat. also, flushes are less common with an ace-high flop b/c so many people overvalue suited aces and routinely play them.
usually i'll go slow on flop and bet a non-flush turn, allowing me to figure out whether someone's flushed before putting a ton of chips in (this assumes decent amount of money behind). if you do that and pair the board, often weaker opponents won't give you credit for the boat and will pay you off big with a good flush. also, they are less likely to get spunky with the ace in suit on the turn if they don't have the flush since they expect to get jammed by a flush.
if your opponents will jam with a lot of non-flush hands, you just suck it up and get money in. you're going to lose a lot of big pots that way though.
in general I think of it as AK with top pair. once you feel out whether there's a bigger hand you can value bet whatever your opponents will call. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7222 Location: NC, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holgininho
Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Posts: 468 Location: Essen
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have read about three quarters of the book, and I'm struggling with the target SPR. Specifically:
- Why isn't my target SPR with AA (and maybe kings) 0 (meaning all the money goes in preflop), but lies between 4 and 10?
- The target SPR for top pair hands like AQ is lower than that for overpair hands (though I think the target SPR for AA should be the lowest possible). But don't you run into problems, if you reach an SPR of 2 against a very tight opponent, as is recommended? The book hasn't addressed reraising, calling a reraise or simply calling a raise yet, but I figure it isn't that important how exactly you reach a low single digit SPR against a tight opponent. In any case quite a lot of money has to go in preflop. But what will be a tight opponent's preflop range for calling a big raise or a reraise? How does a hand like KQ do against this range? Very poorly, I assume. So, basically, I wouldn't want to commit against a really tight opponent with KQ. Ever. Why doesn't the book take preflop ranges into account when recommending target SPRs? Or will this come up later? I think the SPR should be as low as possible with the preflop nuts. But the weaker your preflop hand the more likely you are to run into problems, if you reach a low SPR.
More questions will follow.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silvershade
Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Holgininho wrote: | I have read about three quarters of the book, and I'm struggling with the target SPR. Specifically:
- Why isn't my target SPR with AA (and maybe kings) 0 (meaning all the money goes in preflop), but lies between 4 and 10?
|
I'm only just getting to the 2nd half of the book but I'd be astounded if you arent misreading this. I imagine the target SPR assumes you will see a flop with money still behind, if you are all-in I dont think SPR matters anymore. I don't doubt for a second that the authors are going to encourage you to get all-in with AA -KK pre-flop if you can do so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holgininho
Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Posts: 468 Location: Essen
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Silvershade wrote: | | Holgininho wrote: | I have read about three quarters of the book, and I'm struggling with the target SPR. Specifically:
- Why isn't my target SPR with AA (and maybe kings) 0 (meaning all the money goes in preflop), but lies between 4 and 10?
|
I'm only just getting to the 2nd half of the book but I'd be astounded if you arent misreading this. I imagine the target SPR assumes you will see a flop with money still behind, if you are all-in I dont think SPR matters anymore. I don't doubt for a second that the authors are going to encourage you to get all-in with AA -KK pre-flop if you can do so. |
They are encouraging the reader to get all-in with AA somewhere early in the book. But after all you start planning the hand when you get dealt the cards, therefore I understood that you should actually aim to reach your target SPR. If you hold Aces and reach an SPR of 10 this might be okay, but it certainly can't be your target SPR (as the book states). The book states, however, that an SPR below your target SPR might be less profitable than the target SPR (the book uses AQ as an example): If you reach an SPR of 6 you find yourself in the most profitable situation. If you reach an SPR of 3 the situation might be less profitable. The book doesn't elaborate further on this (at least not in the part that I have read so far, so it might be that I'm missing something here), but this simply can't be true for all preflop hands. Or maybe I simply have problems with the language here. That might well be.
Anyhow, I mainly wanted to point out that I have my difficulties with the target SPRs because they seem to suggest that KQo likes bigger preflop pots than QQ (or AA...) which certainly isn't the case. And if you reach a really low target SPR chances are your tight opponent has a really strong preflop hand.
Edit: If you want to reach an SPR of 2 with KQ against a single tight opponent you have to get 20 % of your (and his) stack in preflop. If effective stacks are 100 BB this means a pot of 40 BB on the flop and 80 BB left in the stacks. How can you get that much money in against a tight opponent without narrowing his range to only a few hands, against which you are in big trouble? Or have I simply missed the point that you should only commit with KQ if the stacks are really shallow? After all, if you raise to 5 BB and get one caller there are around 10 BB in the pot, so you have already reached your target SPR if the hand started with effective stacks of 25 BB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeffnc Mason's Favorite
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7222 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Holgininho wrote: | | - Why isn't my target SPR with AA (and maybe kings) 0 (meaning all the money goes in preflop), but lies between 4 and 10? |
Actually I believe it is, and if so it would have been better if the book was explicit about this. The answer might be something along the lines of not getting called nearly enough when you go all in (especially if you simply raise all-in first in). So you make more profit by picking a higher SPR, where you give your opponent a chance to make something, but still be behind you when he's willing to go all-in. Technically, I think you're right though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
checkmate 53o
Joined: 03 May 2004 Posts: 4042 Location: Cold-calling with Jxo
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Jeff for starting this thread.
I have just finished my 2nd read of this book and so far its been a big help. One change I made after reading it is that now I sit down with 50BB's instead of 100. As a result, my hands have been easier to play. Im far from being an expert at NL so I'm happy to make my hands as easy to play as possible. Im sure this will be a book I reread often.
Does anyone else sit with 50BB's after reading this book? I know its often popular to flame someone for only sitting with half a stack but my bankroll sure isn't complaining. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silvershade
Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm about 2/3rds of the way through and havent altered how much I sit with yet but am seriously considering sitting with around 70bb instead of the 100 I currently sit with. Maybe 50 or 60 would be even better.
My initial take is that a smaller stack size is going to be better for sure.
I'm wondering though, what do you do if you double up? Do you start going for high sprs with pair type hands or rathole? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neku
Joined: 11 Jul 2007 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Re the sitting at the table with only 50 BB: done that too. It does give an advantage.
Re the AA and KK and getting all the money in preflop. I believe they advise to go all in with AA if possible, but not (always) with KK. I'm only in my first reading, but that's what I took away.
I'll be reading PNL several times to get a good grasp, but so far the SPR idea is pretty useful. In a way, it makes a NL hand resemble a Limit hand a bit more, I think. In Limit, you usually have an instinctive feel of how far a hand can or will go. Without the SPR concept, a NL can feel like flying blind (how much of a raise can I call with Axs? how much can I raise with SC's in MP?). SPR will make it easier to evaluate a hand before you put money in, so I expect it will make a major difference in my play, from preflop hand selection to river showdown. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|